MMIT vs. CA
Compare and contrast key facts about IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMIT) and Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF (CA).
MMIT and CA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MMIT is an actively managed fund by New York Life. It was launched on Oct 18, 2017. CA is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the ICE AMT-Free Broad Liquid California Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Dec 13, 2023.
Performance
MMIT vs. CA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MMIT vs. CA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MMIT IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF | -0.05% | 5.03% | 1.46% | 0.35% |
CA Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF | -0.08% | 3.05% | 1.51% | 0.79% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMIT achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly higher than CA's -0.08% return.
MMIT
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -1.95%
- YTD
- -0.05%
- 6M
- 1.43%
- 1Y
- 4.14%
- 3Y*
- 3.10%
- 5Y*
- 1.07%
- 10Y*
- —
CA
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -2.00%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 3.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MMIT vs. CA - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMIT has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than CA's 0.07% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MMIT vs. CA — Risk / Return Rank
MMIT
CA
MMIT vs. CA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMIT) and Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF (CA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MMIT | CA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | 0.89 | +0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.50 | 1.17 | +0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.21 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 1.17 | +0.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.23 | 3.35 | +1.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MMIT | CA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 0.89 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.57 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between MMIT and CA is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MMIT vs. CA - Dividend Comparison
MMIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, more than CA's 3.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMIT IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF | 3.58% | 3.54% | 3.76% | 3.46% | 2.30% | 1.81% | 2.59% | 4.14% | 2.46% | 0.35% |
CA Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF | 2.93% | 3.14% | 3.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MMIT vs. CA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMIT drawdown since its inception was -12.28%, which is greater than CA's maximum drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMIT and CA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMIT | CA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.28% | -5.24% | -7.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.11% | -3.67% | +0.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.19% | -2.00% | -0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.29% | -1.30% | -0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.88% | 1.28% | -0.40% |
Volatility
MMIT vs. CA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMIT) is 1.04%, while Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF (CA) has a volatility of 1.31%. This indicates that MMIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MMIT | CA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.04% | 1.31% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.65% | 1.78% | -0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.80% | 4.40% | -0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.53% | 4.09% | -0.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.33% | 4.09% | +0.24% |