PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMIN vs. HYMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMIN vs. HYMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ MacKay Municipal Insured ETF (MMIN) and SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMIN achieves a 2.53% return, which is significantly lower than HYMB's 3.44% return.


MMIN

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.69%
YTD
2.53%
6M
2.52%
1Y
8.22%
3Y*
3.91%
5Y*
0.78%
10Y*

HYMB

1D
0.00%
1M
1.79%
YTD
3.44%
6M
3.40%
1Y
7.20%
3Y*
4.88%
5Y*
0.44%
10Y*
2.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMIN vs. HYMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMIN
IQ MacKay Municipal Insured ETF
2.53%4.65%0.93%7.45%-11.20%1.35%7.47%8.08%1.97%1.00%
HYMB
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF
3.44%2.04%5.52%7.73%-15.54%5.16%3.74%9.51%4.91%0.30%

Correlation

The correlation between MMIN and HYMB is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2017

0.55

The correlation between MMIN and HYMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.73 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMIN vs. HYMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMIN
MMIN Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
MMIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMIN Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
MMIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMIN Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

HYMB
HYMB Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
HYMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYMB Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
HYMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYMB Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMIN vs. HYMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ MacKay Municipal Insured ETF (MMIN) and SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MMINHYMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.37

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

2.33

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.54

8.25

+2.30

MMIN vs. HYMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMIN Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the HYMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMIN and HYMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MMIN vs. HYMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMIN drawdown since its inception was -16.87%, smaller than the maximum HYMB drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMIN and HYMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMINHYMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.87%

-29.57%

+12.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.87%

-3.11%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.22%

-7.44%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.87%

-20.15%

+3.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

0.00%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.30%

-3.79%

-0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

0.88%

-0.10%

Volatility

MMIN vs. HYMB - Volatility Comparison

IQ MacKay Municipal Insured ETF (MMIN) and SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) have volatilities of 0.85% and 0.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMINHYMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.85%

0.85%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.49%

3.18%

-0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.70%

4.03%

-0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.02%

6.67%

-1.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.95%

11.36%

-4.41%

MMIN vs. HYMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMIN has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than HYMB's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMIN vs. HYMB - Dividend Comparison

MMIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, less than HYMB's 4.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYMB
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF
4.52%4.55%4.29%4.07%3.77%3.19%3.55%3.95%4.03%3.78%4.08%4.54%
MMIN
IQ MacKay Municipal Insured ETF
4.11%4.07%3.96%3.73%2.93%1.72%2.21%2.75%2.78%0.47%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MMIN and HYMB have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYMB has higher volatility (0.85%) compared to MMIN (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMIN dropped -16.87% vs HYMB's -29.57%.

On 5-year performance, MMIN leads with 0.78% vs 0.44% for HYMB. On fees, MMIN is cheaper at 0.31% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MMIN has performed better with a 0.78% return vs 0.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MMIN is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HYMB.

HYMB has the higher dividend yield at 4.52%, compared with 4.11% for MMIN.

MMIN tracks Bloomberg Barclays Municipal All Insured Bond Index, while HYMB tracks Bloomberg Municipal Yield. They also come from different issuers: New York Life and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for MMIN and 0.35% for HYMB.

MMIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMIN and HYMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer