PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMIBX vs. MIEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMIBX vs. MIEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Municipal Income Fund (MMIBX) and MFS International Equity Fund Class R6 (MIEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MMIBX having a 1.87% return and MIEIX slightly higher at 1.95%. Over the past 10 years, MMIBX has underperformed MIEIX with an annualized return of 1.45%, while MIEIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.36% annualized return.


MMIBX

1D
0.12%
1M
1.49%
YTD
1.87%
6M
2.25%
1Y
6.80%
3Y*
3.54%
5Y*
0.04%
10Y*
1.45%

MIEIX

1D
-0.07%
1M
-1.15%
YTD
1.95%
6M
1.62%
1Y
9.38%
3Y*
11.65%
5Y*
6.89%
10Y*
10.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMIBX vs. MIEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMIBX
MFS Municipal Income Fund
1.87%3.56%2.42%5.45%-12.27%2.35%3.28%7.40%0.38%5.00%
MIEIX
MFS International Equity Fund Class R6
1.95%23.22%4.13%19.06%-14.82%15.13%11.11%28.42%-10.66%28.01%

Correlation

The correlation between MMIBX and MIEIX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 1996

-0.05

The correlation between MMIBX and MIEIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMIBX vs. MIEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMIBX
MMIBX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
MMIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
MMIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

MIEIX
MIEIX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
MIEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
MIEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMIBX vs. MIEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Municipal Income Fund (MMIBX) and MFS International Equity Fund Class R6 (MIEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MMIBXMIEIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.13

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

0.81

+1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.48

2.82

+4.66

MMIBX vs. MIEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMIBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the MIEIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMIBX and MIEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MMIBX vs. MIEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMIBX drawdown since its inception was -17.40%, smaller than the maximum MIEIX drawdown of -53.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMIBX and MIEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMIBXMIEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.40%

-53.13%

+35.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.01%

-11.26%

+8.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.23%

-13.43%

+6.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.19%

-28.07%

+10.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.19%

-31.35%

+14.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-2.73%

+1.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.81%

-8.96%

+6.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

3.22%

-2.33%

Volatility

MMIBX vs. MIEIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Municipal Income Fund (MMIBX) is 0.80%, while MFS International Equity Fund Class R6 (MIEIX) has a volatility of 3.73%. This indicates that MMIBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MIEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMIBXMIEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.80%

3.73%

-2.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.32%

10.62%

-8.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.11%

13.33%

-10.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.41%

15.38%

-10.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.34%

15.72%

-11.38%

MMIBX vs. MIEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMIBX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is higher than MIEIX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMIBX vs. MIEIX - Dividend Comparison

MMIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, more than MIEIX's 2.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MIEIX
MFS International Equity Fund Class R6
2.63%2.68%1.47%1.67%1.26%5.40%1.00%3.12%1.63%1.85%1.78%1.71%
MMIBX
MFS Municipal Income Fund
2.95%3.81%2.51%2.05%1.42%1.45%1.86%2.45%2.68%2.67%2.87%2.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


MMIBX and MIEIX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MIEIX has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to MMIBX (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMIBX dropped -17.40% vs MIEIX's -53.13%.

MMIBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMIBX and MIEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer