PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMIBX vs. DODIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMIBX vs. DODIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Municipal Income Fund (MMIBX) and Dodge & Cox Income Fund (DODIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMIBX achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly higher than DODIX's -0.46% return. Over the past 10 years, MMIBX has underperformed DODIX with an annualized return of 1.28%, while DODIX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.63% annualized return.


MMIBX

1D
-0.25%
1M
-1.94%
6M
-0.11%
YTD
0.39%
1Y
4.98%
3Y*
3.02%
5Y*
-0.45%
10Y*
1.28%
ALL TIME*
2.94%

DODIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.18%
6M
-0.77%
YTD
-0.46%
1Y
2.62%
3Y*
4.70%
5Y*
0.78%
10Y*
2.63%
ALL TIME*
5.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MMIBX vs. DODIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMIBX
MFS Municipal Income Fund
0.39%3.56%2.42%5.45%-12.27%2.35%3.28%7.40%0.38%5.00%
DODIX
Dodge & Cox Income Fund
-0.46%8.32%2.25%7.69%-11.42%-0.92%9.46%9.73%-0.31%4.36%

Correlation

The correlation between MMIBX and DODIX is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 1988

0.51

The correlation between MMIBX and DODIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (all time) to 0.63 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMIBX vs. DODIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MMIBX
MMIBX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
MMIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
MMIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

DODIX
DODIX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
DODIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DODIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
DODIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
DODIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
DODIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MMIBX vs. DODIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Municipal Income Fund (MMIBX) and Dodge & Cox Income Fund (DODIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MMIBXDODIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.15

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

1.11

+0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.80

2.77

+4.04

MMIBX vs. DODIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMIBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the DODIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMIBX and DODIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MMIBX vs. DODIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMIBX drawdown since its inception was -17.40%, roughly equal to the maximum DODIX drawdown of -16.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMIBX and DODIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMIBXDODIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.40%

-16.89%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.01%

-3.17%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.27%

-5.29%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.19%

-16.89%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.19%

-16.89%

-0.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.21%

-2.58%

+0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.80%

-1.50%

-1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

1.27%

-0.38%

Volatility

MMIBX vs. DODIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Municipal Income Fund (MMIBX) is 0.98%, while Dodge & Cox Income Fund (DODIX) has a volatility of 1.10%. This indicates that MMIBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DODIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMIBXDODIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.98%

1.10%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.51%

3.20%

-0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.14%

4.08%

-0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.43%

5.59%

-1.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.35%

4.47%

-0.12%

MMIBX vs. DODIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMIBX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is higher than DODIX's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMIBX vs. DODIX - Dividend Comparison

MMIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, less than DODIX's 4.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DODIX
Dodge & Cox Income Fund
4.35%4.23%4.24%3.86%2.19%3.23%4.66%3.63%3.43%3.03%3.25%3.09%
MMIBX
MFS Municipal Income Fund
2.76%3.81%2.51%2.05%1.42%1.45%1.86%2.45%2.68%2.67%2.87%2.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


MMIBX and DODIX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DODIX has higher volatility (1.10%) compared to MMIBX (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMIBX dropped -17.40% vs DODIX's -16.89%.

MMIBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMIBX and DODIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer