MMIBX vs. MEIKX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Municipal Income Fund (MMIBX) and MFS Value Fund (MEIKX).
MMIBX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Dec 28, 1986. MEIKX is managed by MFS. It was launched on May 1, 2006.
Performance
MMIBX vs. MEIKX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MMIBX vs. MEIKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMIBX MFS Municipal Income Fund | -0.62% | 3.56% | 2.42% | 5.45% | -12.27% | 2.35% | 3.28% | 7.40% | 0.38% | 5.00% |
MEIKX MFS Value Fund | 1.11% | 13.37% | 11.98% | 8.32% | -5.92% | 25.59% | 4.09% | 30.18% | -9.81% | 17.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMIBX achieves a -0.62% return, which is significantly lower than MEIKX's 1.11% return. Over the past 10 years, MMIBX has underperformed MEIKX with an annualized return of 1.42%, while MEIKX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.10% annualized return.
MMIBX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -2.17%
- YTD
- -0.62%
- 6M
- 0.61%
- 1Y
- 2.38%
- 3Y*
- 2.71%
- 5Y*
- -0.07%
- 10Y*
- 1.42%
MEIKX
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- -5.00%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 3.65%
- 1Y
- 10.49%
- 3Y*
- 12.15%
- 5Y*
- 8.48%
- 10Y*
- 10.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MMIBX vs. MEIKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMIBX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is higher than MEIKX's 0.43% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MMIBX vs. MEIKX — Risk / Return Rank
MMIBX
MEIKX
MMIBX vs. MEIKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Municipal Income Fund (MMIBX) and MFS Value Fund (MEIKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MMIBX | MEIKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.53 | 0.70 | -0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.73 | 1.04 | -0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.15 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.66 | 1.03 | -0.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.94 | 4.53 | -2.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MMIBX | MEIKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 | 0.70 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 0.61 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.61 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.39 | +0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between MMIBX and MEIKX is -0.11. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
MMIBX vs. MEIKX - Dividend Comparison
MMIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, less than MEIKX's 9.82% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMIBX MFS Municipal Income Fund | 2.95% | 3.81% | 2.51% | 2.05% | 1.42% | 1.45% | 1.86% | 2.45% | 2.68% | 2.67% | 2.87% | 2.98% |
MEIKX MFS Value Fund | 9.82% | 9.72% | 9.49% | 8.58% | 7.77% | 3.43% | 2.75% | 3.28% | 3.76% | 4.14% | 3.84% | 6.12% |
Drawdowns
MMIBX vs. MEIKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMIBX drawdown since its inception was -17.40%, smaller than the maximum MEIKX drawdown of -56.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMIBX and MEIKX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMIBX | MEIKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.40% | -56.81% | +39.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.47% | -11.09% | +5.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.19% | -17.50% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.19% | -36.68% | +19.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.20% | -5.00% | +1.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.81% | -9.51% | +6.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 2.52% | -0.65% |
Volatility
MMIBX vs. MEIKX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS Municipal Income Fund (MMIBX) is 1.27%, while MFS Value Fund (MEIKX) has a volatility of 3.64%. This indicates that MMIBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MEIKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MMIBX | MEIKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.27% | 3.64% | -2.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.89% | 7.85% | -5.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.54% | 14.82% | -9.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.36% | 13.91% | -9.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.32% | 16.55% | -12.23% |