PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMHYX vs. MEIKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMHYX vs. MEIKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Municipal High Income Fund (MMHYX) and MFS Value Fund (MEIKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMHYX achieves a 2.52% return, which is significantly lower than MEIKX's 4.09% return. Over the past 10 years, MMHYX has underperformed MEIKX with an annualized return of 2.85%, while MEIKX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.01% annualized return.


MMHYX

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.91%
YTD
2.52%
6M
2.92%
1Y
8.29%
3Y*
5.69%
5Y*
0.94%
10Y*
2.85%

MEIKX

1D
-0.41%
1M
-0.14%
YTD
4.09%
6M
5.41%
1Y
13.09%
3Y*
13.17%
5Y*
7.70%
10Y*
10.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMHYX vs. MEIKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMHYX
MFS Municipal High Income Fund
2.52%5.02%6.72%5.30%-14.64%5.31%3.39%9.94%2.09%7.66%
MEIKX
MFS Value Fund
4.09%13.37%11.98%8.32%-5.92%25.59%4.09%30.18%-9.81%17.26%

Correlation

The correlation between MMHYX and MEIKX is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2006

-0.10

The correlation between MMHYX and MEIKX shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (all time) to 0.14 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMHYX vs. MEIKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMHYX
MMHYX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
MMHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
MMHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

MEIKX
MEIKX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
MEIKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEIKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEIKX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
MEIKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEIKX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMHYX vs. MEIKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Municipal High Income Fund (MMHYX) and MFS Value Fund (MEIKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MMHYXMEIKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.21

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

1.87

+1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.42

6.48

+3.94

MMHYX vs. MEIKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMHYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the MEIKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMHYX and MEIKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MMHYXMEIKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

1.22

+1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.56

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.61

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

0.40

+0.72

Drawdowns

MMHYX vs. MEIKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMHYX drawdown since its inception was -23.28%, smaller than the maximum MEIKX drawdown of -56.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMHYX and MEIKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMHYXMEIKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.28%

-56.81%

+33.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.91%

-6.76%

+3.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.71%

-13.15%

+5.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.89%

-17.50%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.89%

-36.68%

+16.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-2.20%

+2.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.88%

-9.45%

+6.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

1.95%

-1.12%

Volatility

MMHYX vs. MEIKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Municipal High Income Fund (MMHYX) is 1.33%, while MFS Value Fund (MEIKX) has a volatility of 2.24%. This indicates that MMHYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MEIKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMHYXMEIKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.33%

2.24%

-0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.48%

7.70%

-5.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.43%

10.38%

-6.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.96%

13.91%

-8.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.85%

16.55%

-11.70%

MMHYX vs. MEIKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMHYX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than MEIKX's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMHYX vs. MEIKX - Dividend Comparison

MMHYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, less than MEIKX's 9.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MEIKX
MFS Value Fund
9.54%9.72%9.49%8.58%7.77%3.43%2.75%3.28%3.76%4.14%3.84%6.12%
MMHYX
MFS Municipal High Income Fund
4.36%5.77%3.91%3.59%3.03%2.95%3.57%3.99%4.18%4.38%4.31%4.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


MMHYX and MEIKX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MEIKX has higher volatility (2.24%) compared to MMHYX (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMHYX dropped -23.28% vs MEIKX's -56.81%.

MMHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMHYX and MEIKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer