MMHVX vs. SDHIX
Compare and contrast key facts about MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (MMHVX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration High Income Municipal Bond Fund (SDHIX).
MMHVX is managed by MainStay. It was launched on Mar 30, 2010. SDHIX is managed by Lord Abbett. It was launched on Jun 14, 2015.
Performance
MMHVX vs. SDHIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MMHVX vs. SDHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMHVX MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund | -0.65% | 4.27% | 4.24% | 8.60% | -14.42% | 6.12% | 5.18% | 9.18% | 4.06% | 8.60% |
SDHIX Lord Abbett Short Duration High Income Municipal Bond Fund | -0.32% | 5.24% | 5.38% | 3.71% | -9.77% | 3.85% | 2.37% | 7.27% | 2.33% | 3.72% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMHVX achieves a -0.65% return, which is significantly lower than SDHIX's -0.32% return. Over the past 10 years, MMHVX has outperformed SDHIX with an annualized return of 3.14%, while SDHIX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.91% annualized return.
MMHVX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -2.94%
- YTD
- -0.65%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 3.27%
- 3Y*
- 4.43%
- 5Y*
- 0.94%
- 10Y*
- 3.14%
SDHIX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- YTD
- -0.32%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 3.80%
- 3Y*
- 4.07%
- 5Y*
- 1.21%
- 10Y*
- 1.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MMHVX vs. SDHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMHVX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than SDHIX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MMHVX vs. SDHIX — Risk / Return Rank
MMHVX
SDHIX
MMHVX vs. SDHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (MMHVX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration High Income Municipal Bond Fund (SDHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MMHVX | SDHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.64 | 1.26 | -0.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.90 | 1.76 | -0.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.37 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.66 | 1.39 | -0.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.84 | 5.73 | -3.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MMHVX | SDHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 | 1.26 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.44 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.64 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.02 | 0.65 | +0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between MMHVX and SDHIX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MMHVX vs. SDHIX - Dividend Comparison
MMHVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, less than SDHIX's 4.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMHVX MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund | 4.06% | 5.31% | 3.98% | 3.28% | 3.47% | 2.71% | 3.32% | 3.83% | 3.91% | 3.92% | 4.20% | 4.40% |
SDHIX Lord Abbett Short Duration High Income Municipal Bond Fund | 4.38% | 5.00% | 4.17% | 3.28% | 2.21% | 1.68% | 2.84% | 3.00% | 2.97% | 1.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MMHVX vs. SDHIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMHVX drawdown since its inception was -20.86%, which is greater than SDHIX's maximum drawdown of -13.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMHVX and SDHIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMHVX | SDHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.86% | -13.36% | -7.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.27% | -3.22% | -3.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.86% | -13.36% | -7.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.86% | -13.36% | -7.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.94% | -2.01% | -0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.23% | -3.02% | -0.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 0.78% | +1.47% |
Volatility
MMHVX vs. SDHIX - Volatility Comparison
MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (MMHVX) has a higher volatility of 1.28% compared to Lord Abbett Short Duration High Income Municipal Bond Fund (SDHIX) at 0.68%. This indicates that MMHVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MMHVX | SDHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.28% | 0.68% | +0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.09% | 1.34% | +0.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.65% | 3.46% | +3.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.61% | 2.78% | +2.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.30% | 3.01% | +2.29% |