PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMHVX vs. SDHIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMHVX vs. SDHIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (MMHVX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration High Income Municipal Bond Fund (SDHIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMHVX achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly higher than SDHIX's 1.77% return. Over the past 10 years, MMHVX has outperformed SDHIX with an annualized return of 3.25%, while SDHIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.07% annualized return.


MMHVX

1D
0.25%
1M
1.28%
YTD
2.88%
6M
3.16%
1Y
9.31%
3Y*
5.41%
5Y*
1.15%
10Y*
3.25%

SDHIX

1D
0.07%
1M
0.64%
YTD
1.77%
6M
2.22%
1Y
5.96%
3Y*
5.00%
5Y*
1.32%
10Y*
2.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMHVX vs. SDHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMHVX
MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
2.88%4.27%4.24%8.60%-14.42%6.12%5.18%9.18%4.06%8.60%
SDHIX
Lord Abbett Short Duration High Income Municipal Bond Fund
1.77%5.24%5.38%3.71%-9.77%3.85%2.37%7.27%2.33%3.72%

Correlation

The correlation between MMHVX and SDHIX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.79

The correlation between MMHVX and SDHIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMHVX vs. SDHIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMHVX
MMHVX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
MMHVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMHVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMHVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
MMHVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMHVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

SDHIX
SDHIX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
SDHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
SDHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMHVX vs. SDHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (MMHVX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration High Income Municipal Bond Fund (SDHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MMHVXSDHIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.86

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

2.87

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.49

10.88

-0.39

MMHVX vs. SDHIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMHVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the SDHIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMHVX and SDHIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MMHVXSDHIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

2.89

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.47

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.69

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

0.71

+0.34

Drawdowns

MMHVX vs. SDHIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMHVX drawdown since its inception was -20.86%, which is greater than SDHIX's maximum drawdown of -13.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMHVX and SDHIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMHVXSDHIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.86%

-13.36%

-7.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-2.08%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.16%

-3.34%

-4.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.86%

-13.36%

-7.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.86%

-13.36%

-7.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.20%

-2.98%

-0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

0.55%

+0.33%

Volatility

MMHVX vs. SDHIX - Volatility Comparison

MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (MMHVX) has a higher volatility of 1.36% compared to Lord Abbett Short Duration High Income Municipal Bond Fund (SDHIX) at 0.72%. This indicates that MMHVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMHVXSDHIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

0.72%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.60%

1.51%

+1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.61%

2.07%

+1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.66%

2.81%

+2.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.33%

3.02%

+2.31%

MMHVX vs. SDHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMHVX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than SDHIX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMHVX vs. SDHIX - Dividend Comparison

MMHVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than SDHIX's 4.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MMHVX
MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
3.97%5.31%3.98%3.28%3.47%2.71%3.32%3.83%3.91%3.92%4.20%4.40%
SDHIX
Lord Abbett Short Duration High Income Municipal Bond Fund
4.35%5.00%4.17%3.28%2.21%1.68%2.84%3.00%2.97%1.19%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MMHVX and SDHIX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MMHVX has higher volatility (1.36%) compared to SDHIX (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMHVX dropped -20.86% vs SDHIX's -13.36%.

SDHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMHVX and SDHIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer