MMHVX vs. NMZ
Compare and contrast key facts about MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (MMHVX) and Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund (NMZ).
MMHVX is managed by MainStay. It was launched on Mar 30, 2010. NMZ is an actively managed fund by Nuveen. It was launched on Nov 19, 2003.
Performance
MMHVX vs. NMZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MMHVX vs. NMZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMHVX MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund | -0.22% | 4.27% | 4.24% | 8.60% | -14.42% | 6.12% | 5.18% | 9.18% | 4.06% | 8.60% |
NMZ Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund | 3.39% | 1.56% | 16.52% | 0.69% | -27.36% | 10.41% | 7.33% | 28.36% | -9.47% | 12.87% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMHVX achieves a -0.22% return, which is significantly lower than NMZ's 3.39% return. Over the past 10 years, MMHVX has outperformed NMZ with an annualized return of 3.18%, while NMZ has yielded a comparatively lower 2.88% annualized return.
MMHVX
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -2.19%
- YTD
- -0.22%
- 6M
- 1.25%
- 1Y
- 3.27%
- 3Y*
- 4.58%
- 5Y*
- 1.01%
- 10Y*
- 3.18%
NMZ
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -2.84%
- YTD
- 3.39%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 2.29%
- 3Y*
- 5.20%
- 5Y*
- -0.57%
- 10Y*
- 2.88%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MMHVX vs. NMZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMHVX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than NMZ's 1.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MMHVX vs. NMZ — Risk / Return Rank
MMHVX
NMZ
MMHVX vs. NMZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (MMHVX) and Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund (NMZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MMHVX | NMZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.57 | 0.18 | +0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.80 | 0.32 | +0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.05 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | 0.20 | +0.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.20 | 0.60 | +1.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MMHVX | NMZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 | 0.18 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | -0.04 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.20 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.02 | 0.27 | +0.75 |
Correlation
The correlation between MMHVX and NMZ is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MMHVX vs. NMZ - Dividend Comparison
MMHVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, less than NMZ's 7.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMHVX MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund | 4.04% | 5.31% | 3.98% | 3.28% | 3.47% | 2.71% | 3.32% | 3.83% | 3.91% | 3.92% | 4.20% | 4.40% |
NMZ Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund | 7.60% | 7.71% | 6.35% | 5.44% | 7.04% | 5.10% | 5.09% | 4.99% | 6.15% | 5.94% | 6.94% | 6.67% |
Drawdowns
MMHVX vs. NMZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMHVX drawdown since its inception was -20.86%, smaller than the maximum NMZ drawdown of -58.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMHVX and NMZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMHVX | NMZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.86% | -58.53% | +37.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.27% | -11.04% | +4.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.86% | -40.03% | +19.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.86% | -40.03% | +19.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.52% | -12.20% | +9.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.23% | -9.45% | +6.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 3.69% | -1.44% |
Volatility
MMHVX vs. NMZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MainStay MacKay High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (MMHVX) is 1.39%, while Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund (NMZ) has a volatility of 4.98%. This indicates that MMHVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NMZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MMHVX | NMZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.39% | 4.98% | -3.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.13% | 6.50% | -4.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.65% | 12.70% | -6.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.61% | 12.90% | -7.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.30% | 14.71% | -9.41% |