MMGPX vs. POAGX
MMGPX (Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio) and POAGX (PrimeCap Odyssey Aggressive Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, MMGPX returned -7.25%/yr vs 10.57%/yr for POAGX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MMGPX charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for POAGX.
Performance
MMGPX vs. POAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMGPX achieves a -2.33% return, which is significantly lower than POAGX's 28.13% return.
MMGPX
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -4.55%
- YTD
- -2.33%
- 6M
- -5.94%
- 1Y
- -6.55%
- 3Y*
- 22.02%
- 5Y*
- -7.25%
- 10Y*
- —
POAGX
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- 10.49%
- YTD
- 28.13%
- 6M
- 26.06%
- 1Y
- 62.84%
- 3Y*
- 26.41%
- 5Y*
- 10.57%
- 10Y*
- 16.76%
MMGPX vs. POAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio | -2.33% | 12.58% | 41.83% | 44.34% | -63.37% | -11.55% | 152.67% | 40.20% | 10.89% | 28.18% |
POAGX PrimeCap Odyssey Aggressive Growth Fund | 28.13% | 28.68% | 12.56% | 25.02% | -24.25% | 4.02% | 29.17% | 23.52% | -7.10% | 29.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMGPX and POAGX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017 | 0.77 |
The correlation between MMGPX and POAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMGPX vs. POAGX — Risk / Return Rank
MMGPX
POAGX
MMGPX vs. POAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX) and PrimeCap Odyssey Aggressive Growth Fund (POAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MMGPX | POAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.49 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 3.80 | -4.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.40 | 15.31 | -15.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MMGPX vs. POAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMGPX drawdown since its inception was -75.38%, which is greater than POAGX's maximum drawdown of -55.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMGPX and POAGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMGPX | POAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.38% | -55.77% | -19.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.79% | -16.87% | -10.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.27% | -24.73% | -4.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.70% | -38.80% | -33.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.64% | 0.00% | -41.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.29% | -9.52% | -20.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.62% | 4.18% | +9.44% |
Volatility
MMGPX vs. POAGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX) is 9.77%, while PrimeCap Odyssey Aggressive Growth Fund (POAGX) has a volatility of 10.32%. This indicates that MMGPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMGPX | POAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.77% | 10.32% | -0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.75% | 18.43% | +3.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.61% | 22.23% | +6.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.83% | 23.24% | +16.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.22% | 23.06% | +12.16% |
MMGPX vs. POAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMGPX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than POAGX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
MMGPX vs. POAGX - Dividend Comparison
MMGPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than POAGX's 10.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio | 0.44% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 125.40% | 64.53% | 7.93% | 15.63% | 28.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
POAGX PrimeCap Odyssey Aggressive Growth Fund | 10.34% | 13.25% | 9.90% | 5.54% | 10.78% | 5.93% | 7.84% | 5.33% | 7.82% | 0.86% | 16.63% | 12.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMGPX and POAGX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
POAGX has higher volatility (10.32%) compared to MMGPX (9.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMGPX dropped -75.38% vs POAGX's -55.77%.
POAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MMGPX and POAGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer