MMGPX vs. MXMGX
MMGPX (Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio) and MXMGX (Great-West T. Rowe Price Mid Cap Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, MMGPX returned -6.17%/yr vs 1.73%/yr for MXMGX. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MMGPX charges 0.04%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for MXMGX.
Performance
MMGPX vs. MXMGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMGPX achieves a -0.96% return, which is significantly lower than MXMGX's 2.39% return.
MMGPX
- 1D
- 2.26%
- 1M
- -3.86%
- 6M
- 4.78%
- YTD
- -0.96%
- 1Y
- -10.52%
- 3Y*
- 17.63%
- 5Y*
- -6.17%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.86%
MXMGX
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- 6M
- 2.12%
- YTD
- 2.39%
- 1Y
- 3.95%
- 3Y*
- 5.58%
- 5Y*
- 1.73%
- 10Y*
- 8.68%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
MMGPX vs. MXMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio | -0.96% | 12.58% | 41.83% | 44.34% | -63.37% | -11.55% | 152.67% | 40.20% | 10.89% | 28.18% |
MXMGX Great-West T. Rowe Price Mid Cap Growth Fund | 2.39% | 2.99% | 9.02% | 19.61% | -22.82% | 15.25% | 23.65% | 31.28% | -2.80% | 19.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMGPX and MXMGX is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017 | 0.71 |
The correlation between MMGPX and MXMGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMGPX vs. MXMGX — Risk / Return Rank
MMGPX
MXMGX
MMGPX vs. MXMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX) and Great-West T. Rowe Price Mid Cap Growth Fund (MXMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MMGPX | MXMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.05 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | 0.32 | -0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.66 | 1.07 | -1.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MMGPX vs. MXMGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMGPX drawdown since its inception was -75.38%, which is greater than MXMGX's maximum drawdown of -60.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMGPX and MXMGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMGPX | MXMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.38% | -60.97% | -14.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.79% | -10.29% | -17.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.27% | -23.17% | -6.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.70% | -32.33% | -40.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.82% | -2.15% | -38.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.40% | -11.74% | -18.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.47% | 3.09% | +11.38% |
Volatility
MMGPX vs. MXMGX - Volatility Comparison
Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX) has a higher volatility of 6.84% compared to Great-West T. Rowe Price Mid Cap Growth Fund (MXMGX) at 2.53%. This indicates that MMGPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MXMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMGPX | MXMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.84% | 2.53% | +4.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.99% | 10.53% | +11.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.90% | 13.59% | +15.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.83% | 19.05% | +20.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.11% | 18.89% | +16.22% |
MMGPX vs. MXMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMGPX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than MXMGX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
MMGPX vs. MXMGX - Dividend Comparison
MMGPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MXMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 125.40% | 64.53% | 7.93% | 15.63% | 28.02% | 0.00% |
MXMGX Great-West T. Rowe Price Mid Cap Growth Fund | 1.64% | 1.68% | 3.66% | 2.39% | 2.66% | 4.92% | 2.74% | 2.19% | 6.13% | 4.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMGPX and MXMGX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MMGPX has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to MXMGX (2.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMGPX dropped -75.38% vs MXMGX's -60.97%.
MXMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.25 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MMGPX and MXMGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer