MMGPX vs. HRAUX
MMGPX (Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio) and HRAUX (Carillon Eagle Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, MMGPX returned -7.25%/yr vs 3.97%/yr for HRAUX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MMGPX charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for HRAUX.
Performance
MMGPX vs. HRAUX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMGPX achieves a -2.33% return, which is significantly lower than HRAUX's 9.27% return.
MMGPX
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -4.55%
- YTD
- -2.33%
- 6M
- -5.94%
- 1Y
- -6.55%
- 3Y*
- 22.02%
- 5Y*
- -7.25%
- 10Y*
- —
HRAUX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 4.75%
- YTD
- 9.27%
- 6M
- 7.01%
- 1Y
- 10.11%
- 3Y*
- 12.68%
- 5Y*
- 3.97%
- 10Y*
- 12.70%
MMGPX vs. HRAUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio | -2.33% | 12.58% | 41.83% | 44.34% | -63.37% | -11.55% | 152.67% | 40.20% | 10.89% | 28.18% |
HRAUX Carillon Eagle Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 | 9.27% | 4.92% | 13.09% | 20.25% | -25.56% | 11.64% | 40.35% | 35.04% | -6.07% | 25.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMGPX and HRAUX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017 | 0.82 |
The correlation between MMGPX and HRAUX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMGPX vs. HRAUX — Risk / Return Rank
MMGPX
HRAUX
MMGPX vs. HRAUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX) and Carillon Eagle Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (HRAUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MMGPX | HRAUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.12 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 0.89 | -1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.40 | 2.98 | -3.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MMGPX vs. HRAUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMGPX drawdown since its inception was -75.38%, which is greater than HRAUX's maximum drawdown of -37.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMGPX and HRAUX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMGPX | HRAUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.38% | -37.03% | -38.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.79% | -12.39% | -15.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.27% | -26.67% | -2.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.70% | -34.20% | -38.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.64% | -0.24% | -41.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.29% | -7.24% | -23.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.62% | 3.70% | +9.92% |
Volatility
MMGPX vs. HRAUX - Volatility Comparison
Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX) has a higher volatility of 9.77% compared to Carillon Eagle Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (HRAUX) at 5.97%. This indicates that MMGPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HRAUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMGPX | HRAUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.77% | 5.97% | +3.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.75% | 14.10% | +7.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.61% | 17.59% | +11.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.83% | 22.01% | +17.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.22% | 21.89% | +13.33% |
MMGPX vs. HRAUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMGPX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than HRAUX's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
MMGPX vs. HRAUX - Dividend Comparison
MMGPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than HRAUX's 12.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HRAUX Carillon Eagle Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 | 12.68% | 13.86% | 13.00% | 11.74% | 1.28% | 9.91% | 2.10% | 2.04% | 5.57% | 2.54% | 0.04% | 1.59% |
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio | 0.44% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 125.40% | 64.53% | 7.93% | 15.63% | 28.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMGPX and HRAUX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MMGPX has higher volatility (9.77%) compared to HRAUX (5.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMGPX dropped -75.38% vs HRAUX's -37.03%.
HRAUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MMGPX and HRAUX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer