MMGPX vs. HRAUX
MMGPX (Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio) and HRAUX (Carillon Eagle Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, MMGPX returned -5.11%/yr vs 3.60%/yr for HRAUX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MMGPX charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for HRAUX.
Performance
MMGPX vs. HRAUX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMGPX achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly lower than HRAUX's 7.69% return.
MMGPX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 2.77%
- 6M
- -2.24%
- YTD
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- -7.36%
- 3Y*
- 19.97%
- 5Y*
- -5.11%
- 10Y*
- —
HRAUX
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- 6M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 7.69%
- 1Y
- 6.19%
- 3Y*
- 10.02%
- 5Y*
- 3.60%
- 10Y*
- 11.83%
MMGPX vs. HRAUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio | 1.78% | 12.58% | 41.83% | 44.34% | -63.37% | -11.55% | 152.67% | 40.20% | 10.89% | 28.18% |
HRAUX Carillon Eagle Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 | 7.69% | 4.92% | 13.09% | 20.25% | -25.56% | 11.64% | 40.35% | 35.04% | -6.07% | 25.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMGPX and HRAUX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017 | 0.82 |
The correlation between MMGPX and HRAUX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMGPX vs. HRAUX — Risk / Return Rank
MMGPX
HRAUX
MMGPX vs. HRAUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX) and Carillon Eagle Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (HRAUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MMGPX | HRAUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.07 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.21 | 0.53 | -0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.41 | 1.75 | -2.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MMGPX vs. HRAUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMGPX drawdown since its inception was -75.38%, which is greater than HRAUX's maximum drawdown of -37.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMGPX and HRAUX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMGPX | HRAUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.38% | -37.03% | -38.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.79% | -12.39% | -15.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.27% | -26.67% | -2.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.70% | -34.20% | -38.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.18% | -3.27% | -35.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.35% | -7.21% | -23.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.07% | 3.73% | +10.34% |
Volatility
MMGPX vs. HRAUX - Volatility Comparison
Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX) has a higher volatility of 6.57% compared to Carillon Eagle Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (HRAUX) at 4.97%. This indicates that MMGPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HRAUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMGPX | HRAUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.57% | 4.97% | +1.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.82% | 14.31% | +7.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.50% | 17.75% | +10.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.82% | 22.06% | +17.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.15% | 21.83% | +13.32% |
MMGPX vs. HRAUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMGPX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than HRAUX's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
MMGPX vs. HRAUX - Dividend Comparison
MMGPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HRAUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HRAUX Carillon Eagle Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 | 12.87% | 13.86% | 13.00% | 11.74% | 1.28% | 9.91% | 2.10% | 2.04% | 5.57% | 2.54% | 0.04% | 1.59% |
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 125.40% | 64.53% | 7.93% | 15.63% | 28.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMGPX and HRAUX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MMGPX has higher volatility (6.57%) compared to HRAUX (4.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMGPX dropped -75.38% vs HRAUX's -37.03%.
HRAUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MMGPX and HRAUX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer