HLGEX vs. AMAGX
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth Fund (HLGEX) and Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX).
HLGEX is managed by JPMorgan. It was launched on Mar 2, 1989. AMAGX is managed by Amana. It was launched on Feb 3, 1994.
Performance
HLGEX vs. AMAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HLGEX vs. AMAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLGEX JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth Fund | -5.79% | 8.65% | 22.80% | 23.11% | -27.08% | 10.67% | 48.33% | 39.73% | -5.07% | 29.51% |
AMAGX Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund | -3.22% | 17.62% | 15.73% | 25.67% | -19.49% | 31.51% | 32.93% | 33.09% | 2.47% | 28.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HLGEX achieves a -5.79% return, which is significantly lower than AMAGX's -3.22% return. Over the past 10 years, HLGEX has underperformed AMAGX with an annualized return of 12.70%, while AMAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.74% annualized return.
HLGEX
- 1D
- 3.94%
- 1M
- -6.15%
- YTD
- -5.79%
- 6M
- -8.32%
- 1Y
- 11.90%
- 3Y*
- 12.84%
- 5Y*
- 3.94%
- 10Y*
- 12.70%
AMAGX
- 1D
- 3.57%
- 1M
- -6.50%
- YTD
- -3.22%
- 6M
- -1.86%
- 1Y
- 23.71%
- 3Y*
- 15.41%
- 5Y*
- 10.77%
- 10Y*
- 15.74%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HLGEX vs. AMAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HLGEX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than AMAGX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HLGEX vs. AMAGX — Risk / Return Rank
HLGEX
AMAGX
HLGEX vs. AMAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth Fund (HLGEX) and Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HLGEX | AMAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.56 | 1.19 | -0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.95 | 1.78 | -0.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.25 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | 2.08 | -1.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.75 | 8.67 | -5.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HLGEX | AMAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 | 1.19 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.59 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.86 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.65 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between HLGEX and AMAGX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HLGEX vs. AMAGX - Dividend Comparison
HLGEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.01%, while AMAGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLGEX JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth Fund | 10.01% | 9.43% | 14.70% | 0.00% | 0.79% | 8.87% | 10.61% | 7.29% | 7.26% | 6.41% | 0.04% | 5.32% |
AMAGX Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.95% | 0.65% | 3.64% | 0.52% | 5.44% | 3.15% | 3.47% | 10.90% | 13.67% | 7.45% |
Drawdowns
HLGEX vs. AMAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HLGEX drawdown since its inception was -57.65%, roughly equal to the maximum AMAGX drawdown of -57.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLGEX and AMAGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HLGEX | AMAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.65% | -57.64% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.19% | -11.84% | -2.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.16% | -28.09% | -9.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.16% | -28.09% | -9.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.81% | -7.87% | -2.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.46% | -10.32% | -1.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 2.84% | +1.62% |
Volatility
HLGEX vs. AMAGX - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth Fund (HLGEX) has a higher volatility of 7.64% compared to Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX) at 7.18%. This indicates that HLGEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HLGEX | AMAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.64% | 7.18% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.72% | 12.50% | +1.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.08% | 20.42% | +2.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.32% | 18.24% | +4.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 18.31% | +3.59% |