PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMGEX vs. NBGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMGEX vs. NBGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MassMutual Small Cap Growth Equity Fund (MMGEX) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class (NBGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMGEX achieves a 21.32% return, which is significantly higher than NBGIX's 6.00% return. Over the past 10 years, MMGEX has outperformed NBGIX with an annualized return of 15.31%, while NBGIX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.11% annualized return.


MMGEX

1D
0.00%
1M
2.51%
YTD
21.32%
6M
19.32%
1Y
39.73%
3Y*
19.14%
5Y*
6.45%
10Y*
15.31%

NBGIX

1D
-0.54%
1M
-0.90%
YTD
6.00%
6M
3.77%
1Y
7.13%
3Y*
6.30%
5Y*
2.54%
10Y*
9.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMGEX vs. NBGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMGEX
MassMutual Small Cap Growth Equity Fund
21.32%10.66%14.79%16.35%-26.21%8.52%40.08%61.40%-5.46%24.28%
NBGIX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class
6.00%-4.55%9.20%15.73%-19.35%18.25%25.07%29.68%-6.76%16.02%

Correlation

The correlation between MMGEX and NBGIX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1999

0.90

The correlation between MMGEX and NBGIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMGEX vs. NBGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMGEX
MMGEX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
MMGEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMGEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMGEX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
MMGEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMGEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

NBGIX
NBGIX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
NBGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
NBGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMGEX vs. NBGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MassMutual Small Cap Growth Equity Fund (MMGEX) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class (NBGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MMGEXNBGIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.09

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.83

0.66

+3.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.66

1.76

+13.90

MMGEX vs. NBGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMGEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the NBGIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMGEX and NBGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MMGEXNBGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

0.44

+1.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.13

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.45

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.54

-0.22

Drawdowns

MMGEX vs. NBGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMGEX drawdown since its inception was -63.65%, which is greater than NBGIX's maximum drawdown of -51.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMGEX and NBGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMGEXNBGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.65%

-51.62%

-12.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-10.75%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.79%

-27.48%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.21%

-28.27%

-22.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.21%

-34.53%

-16.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.86%

-9.57%

+4.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.43%

-7.47%

-15.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

3.98%

-1.43%

Volatility

MMGEX vs. NBGIX - Volatility Comparison

MassMutual Small Cap Growth Equity Fund (MMGEX) has a higher volatility of 6.03% compared to Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class (NBGIX) at 4.01%. This indicates that MMGEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NBGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMGEXNBGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.03%

4.01%

+2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.31%

11.32%

+3.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.74%

16.05%

+3.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.42%

19.66%

+12.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.00%

20.22%

+8.78%

MMGEX vs. NBGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMGEX has a 1.41% expense ratio, which is higher than NBGIX's 0.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMGEX vs. NBGIX - Dividend Comparison

MMGEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.27%, more than NBGIX's 15.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MMGEX
MassMutual Small Cap Growth Equity Fund
31.27%37.94%8.94%0.00%0.00%44.40%10.36%32.83%29.40%6.91%0.00%33.83%
NBGIX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class
15.48%16.41%2.14%3.13%11.11%10.91%3.87%6.00%12.49%14.10%6.53%11.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


MMGEX and NBGIX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MMGEX has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to NBGIX (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMGEX dropped -63.65% vs NBGIX's -51.62%.

MMGEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMGEX and NBGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer