PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMGAX vs. MDIJX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMGAX vs. MDIJX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Georgia Municipal Bond Fund (MMGAX) and MFS International Diversification Fund (MDIJX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMGAX achieves a 1.85% return, which is significantly lower than MDIJX's 10.27% return. Over the past 10 years, MMGAX has underperformed MDIJX with an annualized return of 1.74%, while MDIJX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.90% annualized return.


MMGAX

1D
0.20%
1M
0.97%
YTD
1.85%
6M
2.23%
1Y
8.21%
3Y*
3.73%
5Y*
0.56%
10Y*
1.74%

MDIJX

1D
0.62%
1M
4.51%
YTD
10.27%
6M
12.30%
1Y
22.89%
3Y*
16.34%
5Y*
7.22%
10Y*
9.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMGAX vs. MDIJX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMGAX
MFS Georgia Municipal Bond Fund
1.85%4.50%1.66%5.90%-10.72%2.02%3.50%7.15%0.78%4.33%
MDIJX
MFS International Diversification Fund
10.27%27.84%6.41%14.37%-17.12%7.69%15.26%26.00%-11.05%30.29%

Correlation

The correlation between MMGAX and MDIJX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2004

-0.05

The correlation between MMGAX and MDIJX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMGAX vs. MDIJX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMGAX
MMGAX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
MMGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
MMGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

MDIJX
MDIJX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
MDIJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDIJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDIJX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
MDIJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDIJX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMGAX vs. MDIJX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Georgia Municipal Bond Fund (MMGAX) and MFS International Diversification Fund (MDIJX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MMGAXMDIJXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.42

1.79

+0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.80

2.54

+1.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.33

+0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

1.96

+0.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.45

7.43

+2.02

MMGAX vs. MDIJX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMGAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the MDIJX Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMGAX and MDIJX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MMGAXMDIJXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

1.79

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.51

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.68

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

0.47

+0.65

Drawdowns

MMGAX vs. MDIJX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMGAX drawdown since its inception was -16.31%, smaller than the maximum MDIJX drawdown of -56.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMGAX and MDIJX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMGAXMDIJXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.31%

-56.60%

+40.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.13%

-11.40%

+8.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.55%

-12.57%

+5.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.31%

-30.19%

+13.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.31%

-30.19%

+13.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

0.00%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.03%

-9.09%

+7.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

3.01%

-2.15%

Volatility

MMGAX vs. MDIJX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Georgia Municipal Bond Fund (MMGAX) is 1.32%, while MFS International Diversification Fund (MDIJX) has a volatility of 3.98%. This indicates that MMGAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MDIJX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMGAXMDIJXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

3.98%

-2.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.46%

10.17%

-7.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.38%

12.51%

-9.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.63%

14.22%

-9.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.36%

14.70%

-10.34%

MMGAX vs. MDIJX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMGAX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than MDIJX's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMGAX vs. MDIJX - Dividend Comparison

MMGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, less than MDIJX's 4.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDIJX
MFS International Diversification Fund
4.69%5.17%3.50%4.14%2.64%2.70%1.64%2.50%3.14%1.63%2.18%1.69%
MMGAX
MFS Georgia Municipal Bond Fund
3.18%4.12%2.65%2.27%1.59%1.55%2.04%2.77%3.03%3.11%3.16%3.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


MMGAX and MDIJX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDIJX has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to MMGAX (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMGAX dropped -16.31% vs MDIJX's -56.60%.

MMGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMGAX and MDIJX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer