PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMGAX vs. FSMUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMGAX vs. FSMUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Georgia Municipal Bond Fund (MMGAX) and Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMGAX achieves a 1.85% return, which is significantly higher than FSMUX's 1.47% return.


MMGAX

1D
0.20%
1M
0.97%
YTD
1.85%
6M
2.23%
1Y
8.21%
3Y*
3.73%
5Y*
0.56%
10Y*
1.74%

FSMUX

1D
0.23%
1M
0.90%
YTD
1.47%
6M
1.83%
1Y
7.07%
3Y*
3.86%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMGAX vs. FSMUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MMGAX
MFS Georgia Municipal Bond Fund
1.85%4.50%1.66%5.90%-10.72%0.34%
FSMUX
Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund
1.47%3.14%2.99%6.78%-11.25%0.39%

Correlation

The correlation between MMGAX and FSMUX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2021

0.87

The correlation between MMGAX and FSMUX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMGAX vs. FSMUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMGAX
MMGAX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
MMGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
MMGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMUX
FSMUX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FSMUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMUX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMUX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMGAX vs. FSMUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Georgia Municipal Bond Fund (MMGAX) and Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MMGAXFSMUXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.42

2.69

-0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.80

4.63

-0.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.71

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

3.15

-0.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.45

11.49

-2.05

MMGAX vs. FSMUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMGAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the FSMUX Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMGAX and FSMUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MMGAXFSMUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

2.69

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

0.11

+1.01

Drawdowns

MMGAX vs. FSMUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMGAX drawdown since its inception was -16.31%, roughly equal to the maximum FSMUX drawdown of -16.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMGAX and FSMUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMGAXFSMUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.31%

-16.27%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.13%

-2.68%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.55%

-5.95%

-1.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

0.00%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.03%

-5.46%

+3.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

1.83%

-0.97%

Volatility

MMGAX vs. FSMUX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Georgia Municipal Bond Fund (MMGAX) has a higher volatility of 1.32% compared to Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX) at 1.21%. This indicates that MMGAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMGAXFSMUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

1.21%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.46%

2.10%

+0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.38%

3.16%

+0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.63%

4.64%

-0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.36%

4.64%

-0.28%

MMGAX vs. FSMUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMGAX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMUX's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMGAX vs. FSMUX - Dividend Comparison

MMGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, more than FSMUX's 2.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSMUX
Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund
2.99%3.26%3.74%3.18%2.14%0.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MMGAX
MFS Georgia Municipal Bond Fund
3.18%4.12%2.65%2.27%1.59%1.55%2.04%2.77%3.03%3.11%3.16%3.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


MMGAX and FSMUX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MMGAX has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to FSMUX (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMGAX dropped -16.31% vs FSMUX's -16.27%.

FSMUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMGAX and FSMUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer