PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMEYX vs. VRTVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMEYX vs. VRTVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory Integrity Discovery Fund (MMEYX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMEYX achieves a 28.29% return, which is significantly higher than VRTVX's 17.82% return. Over the past 10 years, MMEYX has outperformed VRTVX with an annualized return of 12.39%, while VRTVX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.37% annualized return.


MMEYX

1D
0.26%
1M
3.54%
YTD
28.29%
6M
30.51%
1Y
55.45%
3Y*
24.94%
5Y*
10.45%
10Y*
12.39%

VRTVX

1D
-0.41%
1M
2.22%
YTD
17.82%
6M
19.19%
1Y
44.03%
3Y*
17.95%
5Y*
6.53%
10Y*
10.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMEYX vs. VRTVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMEYX
Victory Integrity Discovery Fund
28.29%14.25%11.36%14.83%-12.01%37.20%-1.34%21.60%-16.10%11.07%
VRTVX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
17.82%12.21%8.07%14.71%-14.52%28.06%4.81%22.40%-12.83%7.91%

Correlation

The correlation between MMEYX and VRTVX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.96

The correlation between MMEYX and VRTVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMEYX vs. VRTVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMEYX
MMEYX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
MMEYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMEYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMEYX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
MMEYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMEYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

VRTVX
VRTVX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VRTVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMEYX vs. VRTVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory Integrity Discovery Fund (MMEYX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MMEYXVRTVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.85

2.45

+0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.89

3.44

+0.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.42

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.56

5.05

+1.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.19

17.17

+3.02

MMEYX vs. VRTVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMEYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is comparable to the VRTVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMEYX and VRTVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MMEYXVRTVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85

2.45

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.30

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.44

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.48

+0.03

Drawdowns

MMEYX vs. VRTVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMEYX drawdown since its inception was -69.05%, which is greater than VRTVX's maximum drawdown of -45.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMEYX and VRTVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMEYXVRTVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.05%

-45.98%

-23.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.19%

-8.54%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.23%

-26.85%

+1.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.82%

-26.85%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.35%

-45.98%

-8.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-1.19%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.57%

-7.78%

-7.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

2.51%

+0.15%

Volatility

MMEYX vs. VRTVX - Volatility Comparison

Victory Integrity Discovery Fund (MMEYX) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX) at 4.83%. This indicates that MMEYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRTVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMEYXVRTVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

4.83%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.89%

11.96%

+0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.39%

17.96%

+1.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.36%

21.67%

+0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.39%

23.71%

+1.68%

MMEYX vs. VRTVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMEYX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than VRTVX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMEYX vs. VRTVX - Dividend Comparison

MMEYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.55%, more than VRTVX's 1.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MMEYX
Victory Integrity Discovery Fund
7.55%9.68%8.36%1.33%8.53%4.34%0.00%2.17%14.87%10.31%3.73%7.64%
VRTVX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.60%1.49%1.84%2.08%2.15%1.56%1.54%1.87%2.17%1.74%1.52%2.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, MMEYX and VRTVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MMEYX has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to VRTVX (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMEYX dropped -69.05% vs VRTVX's -45.98%.

MMEYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMEYX and VRTVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer