MMCFX vs. GSAGX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MMCFX (AMG Veritas China Fund) and GSAGX (Goldman Sachs China Equity Fund) are both China Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MMCFX returned 5.59%/yr vs 5.68%/yr for GSAGX. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MMCFX charges 1.14%/yr vs 1.47%/yr for GSAGX.

Performance

MMCFX vs. GSAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG Veritas China Fund (MMCFX) and Goldman Sachs China Equity Fund (GSAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMCFX achieves a 9.00% return, which is significantly higher than GSAGX's 3.32% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MMCFX having a 5.59% annualized return and GSAGX not far ahead at 5.68%.

MMCFX

• 1D: 3.02%
• 1M: 3.93%
• YTD: 9.00%
• 6M: 8.69%
• 1Y: 26.72%
• 3Y*: 5.18%
• 5Y*: -6.52%
• 10Y*: 5.59%

GSAGX

• 1D: 1.46%
• 1M: -1.93%
• YTD: 3.32%
• 6M: 3.08%
• 1Y: 21.34%
• 3Y*: 9.89%
• 5Y*: -5.86%
• 10Y*: 5.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMCFX vs. GSAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MMCFX AMG Veritas China Fund	9.00%	27.88%	-0.59%	-18.35%	-26.33%	-0.49%	17.79%	27.49%	-5.22%	24.07%
GSAGX Goldman Sachs China Equity Fund	3.32%	32.36%	13.00%	-18.78%	-30.71%	-14.26%	48.21%	26.22%	-18.45%	51.62%

Correlation

The correlation between MMCFX and GSAGX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1995	0.56

Over the past year, MMCFX and GSAGX have become more correlated (0.93) than their long-term average of 0.56, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

MMCFX vs. GSAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMCFX

MMCFX Risk / Return Rank: 16
MMCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
MMCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
MMCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
MMCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
MMCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

GSAGX

GSAGX Risk / Return Rank: 19
GSAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
GSAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
GSAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
GSAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
GSAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMCFX vs. GSAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Veritas China Fund (MMCFX) and Goldman Sachs China Equity Fund (GSAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MMCFX	GSAGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.12	1.12	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.58	1.63	-0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.20	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.38	1.70	-0.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.98	4.39	-1.40

MMCFX vs. GSAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMCFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the GSAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMCFX and GSAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MMCFX vs. GSAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMCFX drawdown since its inception was -70.40%, roughly equal to the maximum GSAGX drawdown of -70.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMCFX and GSAGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MMCFX	GSAGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.40%	-70.73%	+0.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.42%	-12.15%	-6.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.01%	-25.08%	-3.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.12%	-58.97%	+1.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.48%	-63.98%	+6.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.96%	-37.95%	+4.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.68%	-28.61%	+1.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.53%	4.70%	+3.83%

Volatility

MMCFX vs. GSAGX - Volatility Comparison

AMG Veritas China Fund (MMCFX) has a higher volatility of 10.15% compared to Goldman Sachs China Equity Fund (GSAGX) at 6.50%. This indicates that MMCFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MMCFX	GSAGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.15%	6.50%	+3.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.37%	13.72%	+3.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.85%	18.43%	+4.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.56%	25.49%	+0.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.85%	22.70%	+2.15%

MMCFX vs. GSAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMCFX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is lower than GSAGX's 1.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

MMCFX vs. GSAGX - Dividend Comparison

MMCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than GSAGX's 1.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GSAGX Goldman Sachs China Equity Fund	1.30%	1.34%	1.40%	0.89%	0.00%	6.78%	5.02%	0.57%	6.92%	1.35%	0.00%	0.00%
MMCFX AMG Veritas China Fund	0.30%	0.32%	1.34%	0.83%	0.00%	114.57%	4.66%	9.14%	25.03%	12.44%	0.35%	12.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MMCFX and GSAGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, MMCFX and GSAGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MMCFX or GSAGX?

MMCFX has higher volatility (10.15%) compared to GSAGX (6.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMCFX dropped -70.40% vs GSAGX's -70.73%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.