MMAX vs. IBIT
MMAX (iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MMAX is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by iShares, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. MMAX is actively managed, while IBIT is passively managed. Over the past year, MMAX returned 7.67% vs -38.74% for IBIT. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MMAX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
MMAX vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMAX achieves a 3.09% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -25.48% return.
MMAX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 3.09%
- 6M
- 3.75%
- 1Y
- 7.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBIT
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- -18.50%
- YTD
- -25.48%
- 6M
- -29.84%
- 1Y
- -38.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MMAX vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF | 3.09% | 5.88% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -25.48% | 2.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMAX and IBIT is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMAX vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
MMAX
IBIT
MMAX vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF (MMAX) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MMAX | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 5.52 | -0.89 | +6.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 10.56 | -1.23 | +11.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.51 | 0.86 | +1.65 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 22.49 | -0.79 | +23.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 112.49 | -1.36 | +113.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MMAX | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.52 | -0.89 | +6.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.13 | 0.30 | +2.84 |
Drawdowns
MMAX vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMAX drawdown since its inception was -1.93%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMAX and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMAX | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.93% | -49.36% | +47.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.34% | -49.36% | +49.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -48.10% | +47.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.10% | -16.02% | +15.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.07% | 28.44% | -28.37% |
Volatility
MMAX vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF (MMAX) is 0.36%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 9.50%. This indicates that MMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMAX | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.36% | 9.50% | -9.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.96% | 34.44% | -33.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39% | 43.73% | -42.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.49% | 50.19% | -47.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.49% | 50.19% | -47.70% |
MMAX vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMAX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
MMAX vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
MMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF | 1.27% | 1.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMAX and IBIT have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIT has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to MMAX (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMAX dropped -1.93% vs IBIT's -49.36%.
On 1-year performance, MMAX leads with 7.67% vs -38.74% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, MMAX has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MMAX has performed better with a 7.67% return vs -38.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MMAX.
MMAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.
MMAX is categorized as Defined Outcome, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MMAX and 0.25% for IBIT.
MMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.52 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MMAX and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer