PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMAX vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMAX vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF (MMAX) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMAX achieves a 3.09% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -25.48% return.


MMAX

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.60%
YTD
3.09%
6M
3.75%
1Y
7.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBIT

1D
-2.76%
1M
-18.50%
YTD
-25.48%
6M
-29.84%
1Y
-38.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMAX vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MMAX
iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF
3.09%5.88%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-25.48%2.80%

Correlation

The correlation between MMAX and IBIT is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMAX vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMAX
MMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
MMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMAX vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF (MMAX) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MMAXIBITDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

5.52

-0.89

+6.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

10.56

-1.23

+11.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.51

0.86

+1.65

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

22.49

-0.79

+23.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

112.49

-1.36

+113.85

MMAX vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMAX Sharpe Ratio is 5.52, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMAX and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MMAXIBITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.52

-0.89

+6.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.13

0.30

+2.84

Drawdowns

MMAX vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMAX drawdown since its inception was -1.93%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMAX and IBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMAXIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.93%

-49.36%

+47.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.34%

-49.36%

+49.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-48.10%

+47.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.10%

-16.02%

+15.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

28.44%

-28.37%

Volatility

MMAX vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF (MMAX) is 0.36%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 9.50%. This indicates that MMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMAXIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.36%

9.50%

-9.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.96%

34.44%

-33.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39%

43.73%

-42.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.49%

50.19%

-47.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.49%

50.19%

-47.70%

MMAX vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMAX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMAX vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

MMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%
MMAX
iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF
1.27%1.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


MMAX and IBIT have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBIT has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to MMAX (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMAX dropped -1.93% vs IBIT's -49.36%.

On 1-year performance, MMAX leads with 7.67% vs -38.74% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, MMAX has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MMAX has performed better with a 7.67% return vs -38.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MMAX.

MMAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

MMAX is categorized as Defined Outcome, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MMAX and 0.25% for IBIT.

MMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.52 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMAX and IBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer