PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMAIX vs. FIQDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMAIX vs. FIQDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Moderate Allocation Fund (MMAIX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z (FIQDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMAIX achieves a 4.77% return, which is significantly lower than FIQDX's 6.68% return.


MMAIX

1D
-0.14%
1M
1.04%
YTD
4.77%
6M
4.31%
1Y
11.33%
3Y*
10.61%
5Y*
4.96%
10Y*
8.02%

FIQDX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.68%
YTD
6.68%
6M
6.44%
1Y
12.93%
3Y*
9.38%
5Y*
6.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMAIX vs. FIQDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MMAIX
MFS Moderate Allocation Fund
4.77%11.68%8.68%12.23%-15.03%12.04%13.86%22.10%-7.71%
FIQDX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z
6.68%10.40%6.03%4.55%-3.17%15.96%3.79%10.63%-4.90%

Correlation

The correlation between MMAIX and FIQDX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2018

0.67

The correlation between MMAIX and FIQDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMAIX vs. FIQDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMAIX
MMAIX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
MMAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MMAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

FIQDX
FIQDX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FIQDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIQDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIQDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FIQDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIQDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMAIX vs. FIQDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Moderate Allocation Fund (MMAIX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z (FIQDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MMAIXFIQDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.51

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

4.72

-2.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.12

18.89

-10.77

MMAIX vs. FIQDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMAIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the FIQDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMAIX and FIQDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MMAIX vs. FIQDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMAIX drawdown since its inception was -37.57%, which is greater than FIQDX's maximum drawdown of -19.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMAIX and FIQDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMAIXFIQDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.57%

-19.98%

-17.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.22%

-2.69%

-3.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.38%

-5.91%

-3.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.36%

-12.79%

-8.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-2.69%

+2.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.89%

-2.97%

-0.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

0.67%

+0.79%

Volatility

MMAIX vs. FIQDX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Moderate Allocation Fund (MMAIX) has a higher volatility of 2.66% compared to Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z (FIQDX) at 1.40%. This indicates that MMAIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIQDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMAIXFIQDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

1.40%

+1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.09%

3.72%

+2.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.51%

4.81%

+2.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.78%

6.91%

+2.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.02%

7.40%

+2.62%

MMAIX vs. FIQDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMAIX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FIQDX's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMAIX vs. FIQDX - Dividend Comparison

MMAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.25%, more than FIQDX's 4.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIQDX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z
4.27%4.75%4.88%5.38%7.39%5.44%2.29%3.17%8.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MMAIX
MFS Moderate Allocation Fund
7.25%7.60%7.09%3.69%4.31%5.70%3.88%4.70%6.34%4.66%2.92%5.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


MMAIX and FIQDX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MMAIX has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to FIQDX (1.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMAIX dropped -37.57% vs FIQDX's -19.98%.

FIQDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMAIX and FIQDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer