MLXIX vs. CAXAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX) and Catalyst/MAP Global Equity Fund (CAXAX).
MLXIX is managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. It was launched on Dec 21, 2014. CAXAX is managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. It was launched on Jul 28, 2011.
Performance
MLXIX vs. CAXAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MLXIX vs. CAXAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLXIX Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund | 35.24% | -8.56% | 45.26% | 15.34% | 27.02% | 42.04% | -20.02% | 12.05% | -18.48% | -13.83% |
CAXAX Catalyst/MAP Global Equity Fund | 2.89% | 22.46% | 7.62% | 10.71% | -11.04% | 16.54% | 5.48% | 18.84% | -3.19% | 17.11% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLXIX achieves a 35.24% return, which is significantly higher than CAXAX's 2.89% return. Over the past 10 years, MLXIX has outperformed CAXAX with an annualized return of 15.06%, while CAXAX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.07% annualized return.
MLXIX
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 14.05%
- YTD
- 35.24%
- 6M
- 26.46%
- 1Y
- 21.20%
- 3Y*
- 27.68%
- 5Y*
- 25.39%
- 10Y*
- 15.06%
CAXAX
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -8.12%
- YTD
- 2.89%
- 6M
- 5.51%
- 1Y
- 21.04%
- 3Y*
- 12.01%
- 5Y*
- 7.67%
- 10Y*
- 9.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MLXIX vs. CAXAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLXIX has a 1.43% expense ratio, which is higher than CAXAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MLXIX vs. CAXAX — Risk / Return Rank
MLXIX
CAXAX
MLXIX vs. CAXAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX) and Catalyst/MAP Global Equity Fund (CAXAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLXIX | CAXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.91 | 1.69 | -0.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.26 | 2.32 | -1.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.34 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.19 | 2.20 | -1.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.36 | 9.34 | -6.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLXIX | CAXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 1.69 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.15 | 0.63 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.66 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.65 | -0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between MLXIX and CAXAX is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MLXIX vs. CAXAX - Dividend Comparison
MLXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.52%, more than CAXAX's 6.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLXIX Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund | 6.52% | 8.26% | 5.02% | 6.67% | 7.15% | 8.26% | 14.52% | 15.93% | 15.62% | 11.37% | 8.76% | 11.47% |
CAXAX Catalyst/MAP Global Equity Fund | 6.35% | 6.53% | 8.29% | 2.38% | 0.00% | 1.75% | 1.78% | 4.67% | 9.90% | 2.88% | 1.57% | 1.18% |
Drawdowns
MLXIX vs. CAXAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLXIX drawdown since its inception was -76.78%, which is greater than CAXAX's maximum drawdown of -32.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLXIX and CAXAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLXIX | CAXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.78% | -32.50% | -44.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.50% | -9.26% | -7.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.14% | -22.76% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.63% | -32.50% | -40.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.51% | -8.12% | +6.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.47% | -3.81% | -19.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.33% | 2.18% | +6.15% |
Volatility
MLXIX vs. CAXAX - Volatility Comparison
Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to Catalyst/MAP Global Equity Fund (CAXAX) at 4.03%. This indicates that MLXIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAXAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MLXIX | CAXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.04% | 4.03% | +2.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.30% | 7.74% | +5.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.26% | 12.61% | +10.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.13% | 12.31% | +9.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.33% | 13.83% | +14.50% |