PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLVHX vs. SWPPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLVHX vs. SWPPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Low Volatility Equity Fund (MLVHX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLVHX achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than SWPPX's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, MLVHX has underperformed SWPPX with an annualized return of 10.48%, while SWPPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.63% annualized return.


MLVHX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.94%
YTD
1.41%
6M
1.40%
1Y
7.97%
3Y*
11.23%
5Y*
7.76%
10Y*
10.48%

SWPPX

1D
0.15%
1M
5.83%
YTD
11.69%
6M
11.71%
1Y
28.97%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLVHX vs. SWPPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLVHX
MFS Low Volatility Equity Fund
1.41%9.96%13.91%12.40%-10.84%25.42%11.63%27.17%-1.22%16.17%
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
11.69%17.87%24.96%26.26%-18.14%28.67%18.38%31.46%-4.47%21.81%

Correlation

The correlation between MLVHX and SWPPX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2013

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between MLVHX and SWPPX has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLVHX vs. SWPPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLVHX
MLVHX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
MLVHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLVHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLVHX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
MLVHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLVHX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

SWPPX
SWPPX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SWPPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWPPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWPPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SWPPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWPPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLVHX vs. SWPPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Low Volatility Equity Fund (MLVHX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLVHXSWPPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.46

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

3.36

-2.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.32

15.67

-12.35

MLVHX vs. SWPPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLVHX Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the SWPPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLVHX and SWPPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLVHXSWPPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

2.52

-1.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.85

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.86

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.51

+0.16

Drawdowns

MLVHX vs. SWPPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLVHX drawdown since its inception was -34.14%, smaller than the maximum SWPPX drawdown of -55.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLVHX and SWPPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLVHXSWPPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.14%

-55.06%

+20.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

-8.89%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.92%

-18.74%

-2.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.92%

-24.51%

+3.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.14%

-33.80%

-0.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.47%

0.00%

-4.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.90%

-9.95%

+6.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

1.90%

+0.57%

Volatility

MLVHX vs. SWPPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Low Volatility Equity Fund (MLVHX) is 2.28%, while Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX) has a volatility of 2.83%. This indicates that MLVHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWPPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLVHXSWPPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.28%

2.83%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.00%

8.98%

-1.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.52%

11.87%

-2.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.23%

16.93%

-1.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.22%

18.23%

-2.01%

MLVHX vs. SWPPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLVHX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than SWPPX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLVHX vs. SWPPX - Dividend Comparison

MLVHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.19%, more than SWPPX's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLVHX
MFS Low Volatility Equity Fund
15.19%15.40%13.51%6.47%13.00%5.33%1.25%1.17%4.99%2.23%1.19%1.90%
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
0.99%1.11%1.23%1.43%1.67%1.27%1.81%1.95%2.67%1.79%2.55%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLVHX and SWPPX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SWPPX has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to MLVHX (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLVHX dropped -34.14% vs SWPPX's -55.06%.

SWPPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLVHX and SWPPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer