MLVHX vs. HTGC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Low Volatility Equity Fund (MLVHX) and Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC).

MLVHX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Dec 5, 2013.

Performance

MLVHX vs. HTGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Low Volatility Equity Fund (MLVHX) and Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MLVHX vs. HTGC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MLVHX MFS Low Volatility Equity Fund	-0.79%	9.96%	13.91%	12.40%	-10.84%	25.42%	11.63%	27.17%	-1.22%	16.17%
HTGC Hercules Capital, Inc.	-20.14%	3.54%	33.33%	42.91%	-10.42%	26.50%	14.49%	39.86%	-6.86%	1.86%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLVHX achieves a -0.79% return, which is significantly higher than HTGC's -20.14% return. Over the past 10 years, MLVHX has underperformed HTGC with an annualized return of 10.29%, while HTGC has yielded a comparatively higher 12.82% annualized return.

MLVHX

• 1D: 1.56%
• 1M: -6.39%
• YTD: -0.79%
• 6M: -0.26%
• 1Y: 7.41%
• 3Y*: 10.99%
• 5Y*: 8.41%
• 10Y*: 10.29%

HTGC

• 1D: -1.42%
• 1M: -0.27%
• YTD: -20.14%
• 6M: -17.08%
• 1Y: -14.96%
• 3Y*: 16.16%
• 5Y*: 8.90%
• 10Y*: 12.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MLVHX vs. HTGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLVHX

MLVHX Risk / Return Rank: 20
MLVHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
MLVHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
MLVHX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
MLVHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
MLVHX Martin Ratio Rank: 27

HTGC

HTGC Risk / Return Rank: 14
HTGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
HTGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
HTGC Omega Ratio Rank: 16
HTGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
HTGC Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLVHX vs. HTGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Low Volatility Equity Fund (MLVHX) and Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MLVHX	HTGC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.54	-0.59	+1.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.85	-0.66	+1.51
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	0.91	+0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.84	-0.62	+1.46
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.52	-1.65	+5.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MLVHX vs. HTGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLVHX Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is higher than the HTGC Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLVHX and HTGC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MLVHX	HTGC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54	-0.59	+1.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	0.35	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	0.46	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	0.34	+0.32

Correlation

The correlation between MLVHX and HTGC is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MLVHX vs. HTGC - Dividend Comparison

MLVHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.52%, more than HTGC's 12.91% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MLVHX MFS Low Volatility Equity Fund	15.52%	15.40%	13.51%	6.47%	13.00%	5.33%	1.25%	1.17%	4.99%	2.23%	1.19%	1.90%
HTGC Hercules Capital, Inc.	12.91%	9.99%	9.56%	11.40%	13.77%	9.76%	9.02%	9.49%	11.40%	9.45%	8.79%	10.17%

Drawdowns

MLVHX vs. HTGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLVHX drawdown since its inception was -34.14%, smaller than the maximum HTGC drawdown of -68.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLVHX and HTGC.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLVHX	HTGC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.14%	-68.21%	+34.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.89%	-24.74%	+14.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.92%	-36.11%	+15.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.14%	-57.54%	+23.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.54%	-24.50%	+17.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.89%	-10.80%	+6.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.35%	9.39%	-7.04%

Volatility

MLVHX vs. HTGC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Low Volatility Equity Fund (MLVHX) is 3.68%, while Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC) has a volatility of 8.78%. This indicates that MLVHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLVHX	HTGC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.68%	8.78%	-5.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.98%	19.72%	-12.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.44%	25.59%	-12.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.25%	25.65%	-10.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.21%	27.76%	-11.55%