PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MLVHX vs. HTGC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MLVHX and HTGC is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

MLVHX vs. HTGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Low Volatility Equity Fund (MLVHX) and Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-8.77%
20.03%
MLVHX
HTGC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MLVHX:

0.05

HTGC:

1.27

Sortino Ratio

MLVHX:

0.14

HTGC:

1.59

Omega Ratio

MLVHX:

1.03

HTGC:

1.26

Calmar Ratio

MLVHX:

0.04

HTGC:

1.47

Martin Ratio

MLVHX:

0.12

HTGC:

4.44

Ulcer Index

MLVHX:

6.31%

HTGC:

6.07%

Daily Std Dev

MLVHX:

14.35%

HTGC:

21.18%

Max Drawdown

MLVHX:

-34.15%

HTGC:

-68.50%

Current Drawdown

MLVHX:

-12.97%

HTGC:

-1.32%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLVHX achieves a 3.60% return, which is significantly lower than HTGC's 8.06% return. Over the past 10 years, MLVHX has underperformed HTGC with an annualized return of 6.65%, while HTGC has yielded a comparatively higher 14.53% annualized return.


MLVHX

YTD

3.60%

1M

1.21%

6M

-8.25%

1Y

0.49%

5Y*

2.64%

10Y*

6.65%

HTGC

YTD

8.06%

1M

4.12%

6M

21.21%

1Y

27.98%

5Y*

18.49%

10Y*

14.53%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MLVHX vs. HTGC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLVHX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MLVHX is 88
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MLVHX is 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MLVHX is 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MLVHX is 88
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MLVHX is 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MLVHX is 88
Martin Ratio Rank

HTGC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HTGC is 8080
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HTGC is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HTGC is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HTGC is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HTGC is 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HTGC is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MLVHX vs. HTGC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Low Volatility Equity Fund (MLVHX) and Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MLVHX, currently valued at 0.05, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.051.27
The chart of Sortino ratio for MLVHX, currently valued at 0.14, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.141.59
The chart of Omega ratio for MLVHX, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.031.26
The chart of Calmar ratio for MLVHX, currently valued at 0.04, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.041.47
The chart of Martin ratio for MLVHX, currently valued at 0.12, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.000.124.44
MLVHX
HTGC

The current MLVHX Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the HTGC Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLVHX and HTGC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.05
1.27
MLVHX
HTGC

Dividends

MLVHX vs. HTGC - Dividend Comparison

MLVHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than HTGC's 7.37% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MLVHX
MFS Low Volatility Equity Fund
1.20%1.25%1.15%1.19%0.75%1.25%1.05%1.57%1.47%1.41%2.15%1.65%
HTGC
Hercules Capital, Inc.
7.37%7.96%11.40%14.90%9.34%9.57%9.49%11.40%9.45%8.79%10.17%8.33%

Drawdowns

MLVHX vs. HTGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLVHX drawdown since its inception was -34.15%, smaller than the maximum HTGC drawdown of -68.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLVHX and HTGC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-12.97%
-1.32%
MLVHX
HTGC

Volatility

MLVHX vs. HTGC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Low Volatility Equity Fund (MLVHX) is 2.34%, while Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC) has a volatility of 4.45%. This indicates that MLVHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.34%
4.45%
MLVHX
HTGC
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab