MLVHX vs. RCKSX

Last updated Jul 3, 2026

MLVHX (MFS Low Volatility Equity Fund) and RCKSX (Rock Oak Core Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MLVHX returned 10.55%/yr vs 11.45%/yr for RCKSX. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MLVHX charges 0.67%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for RCKSX.

Performance

MLVHX vs. RCKSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Low Volatility Equity Fund (MLVHX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLVHX achieves a 4.29% return, which is significantly lower than RCKSX's 17.86% return. Over the past 10 years, MLVHX has underperformed RCKSX with an annualized return of 10.55%, while RCKSX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.45% annualized return.

MLVHX

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 2.84%
• 6M: 4.29%
• YTD: 4.29%
• 1Y: 9.27%
• 3Y*: 11.05%
• 5Y*: 7.54%
• 10Y*: 10.55%

RCKSX

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 3.29%
• 6M: 17.86%
• YTD: 17.86%
• 1Y: 20.92%
• 3Y*: 18.95%
• 5Y*: 8.18%
• 10Y*: 11.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLVHX vs. RCKSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MLVHX MFS Low Volatility Equity Fund	4.29%	9.96%	13.91%	12.40%	-10.84%	25.42%	11.63%	27.17%	-1.22%	16.17%
RCKSX Rock Oak Core Growth Fund	17.86%	12.99%	15.12%	15.57%	-18.09%	9.96%	13.75%	19.05%	-2.14%	22.69%

Correlation

The correlation between MLVHX and RCKSX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2013	0.80

The correlation between MLVHX and RCKSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MLVHX vs. RCKSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLVHX

MLVHX Risk / Return Rank: 18
MLVHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
MLVHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
MLVHX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
MLVHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
MLVHX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

RCKSX

RCKSX Risk / Return Rank: 72
RCKSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
RCKSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
RCKSX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
RCKSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
RCKSX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLVHX vs. RCKSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Low Volatility Equity Fund (MLVHX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MLVHX	RCKSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.95	1.83	-0.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.42	2.64	-1.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.30	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.08	5.10	-4.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.36	14.10	-10.73

MLVHX vs. RCKSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLVHX Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the RCKSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLVHX and RCKSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MLVHX vs. RCKSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLVHX drawdown since its inception was -34.14%, smaller than the maximum RCKSX drawdown of -57.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLVHX and RCKSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLVHX	RCKSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.14%	-57.88%	+23.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.30%	-4.14%	-4.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.92%	-18.22%	-2.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.92%	-22.54%	+1.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.14%	-33.10%	-1.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.76%	0.00%	-1.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.89%	-9.47%	+5.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.66%	1.50%	+1.16%

Volatility

MLVHX vs. RCKSX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Low Volatility Equity Fund (MLVHX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX) have volatilities of 2.74% and 2.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLVHX	RCKSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.74%	2.75%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.19%	7.98%	-0.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.53%	11.57%	-2.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.24%	15.62%	-0.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.20%	17.42%	-1.22%

MLVHX vs. RCKSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLVHX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than RCKSX's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLVHX vs. RCKSX - Dividend Comparison

MLVHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.71%, more than RCKSX's 5.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MLVHX MFS Low Volatility Equity Fund	14.71%	15.40%	13.51%	6.47%	13.00%	5.33%	1.25%	1.17%	4.99%	2.23%	1.19%	1.90%
RCKSX Rock Oak Core Growth Fund	5.31%	6.26%	0.47%	0.71%	1.00%	4.31%	16.56%	3.18%	0.59%	5.91%	0.70%	3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLVHX and RCKSX in my portfolio?

MLVHX and RCKSX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MLVHX or RCKSX?

RCKSX has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to MLVHX (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLVHX dropped -34.14% vs RCKSX's -57.88%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RCKSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.