PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLVHX vs. FSUVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLVHX vs. FSUVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Low Volatility Equity Fund (MLVHX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund (FSUVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLVHX achieves a 6.72% return, which is significantly lower than FSUVX's 8.73% return. Over the past 10 years, MLVHX has underperformed FSUVX with an annualized return of 10.57%, while FSUVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.13% annualized return.


MLVHX

1D
-0.74%
1M
1.07%
6M
4.42%
YTD
6.72%
1Y
12.87%
3Y*
11.61%
5Y*
7.30%
10Y*
10.57%
ALL TIME*
10.63%

FSUVX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.14%
6M
6.39%
YTD
8.73%
1Y
14.88%
3Y*
14.07%
5Y*
9.11%
10Y*
11.13%
ALL TIME*
11.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MLVHX vs. FSUVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLVHX
MFS Low Volatility Equity Fund
6.72%9.96%13.91%12.40%-10.84%25.42%11.63%27.17%-1.22%16.17%
FSUVX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund
8.73%11.03%17.40%14.80%-10.93%21.51%9.86%27.73%1.35%17.68%

Correlation

The correlation between MLVHX and FSUVX is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2015

0.95

The correlation between MLVHX and FSUVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLVHX vs. FSUVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MLVHX
MLVHX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
MLVHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLVHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLVHX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MLVHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLVHX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

FSUVX
FSUVX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FSUVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSUVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSUVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FSUVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSUVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MLVHX vs. FSUVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Low Volatility Equity Fund (MLVHX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund (FSUVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MLVHXFSUVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.27

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

1.87

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.33

7.68

-3.34

MLVHX vs. FSUVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLVHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the FSUVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLVHX and FSUVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MLVHX vs. FSUVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLVHX drawdown since its inception was -34.14%, which is greater than FSUVX's maximum drawdown of -32.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLVHX and FSUVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLVHXFSUVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.14%

-32.41%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

-7.28%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.92%

-11.55%

-9.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.92%

-19.48%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.14%

-32.41%

-1.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.21%

-0.68%

-0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.87%

-3.25%

-0.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

1.77%

+0.89%

Volatility

MLVHX vs. FSUVX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Low Volatility Equity Fund (MLVHX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund (FSUVX) have volatilities of 3.22% and 3.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLVHXFSUVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.22%

3.36%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.44%

7.10%

+0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.71%

9.00%

+0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.26%

13.00%

+2.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.22%

15.19%

+1.03%

MLVHX vs. FSUVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLVHX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than FSUVX's 0.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLVHX vs. FSUVX - Dividend Comparison

MLVHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.37%, more than FSUVX's 4.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSUVX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund
4.09%4.45%2.25%1.74%4.12%3.52%1.31%3.80%2.63%2.94%2.23%1.17%
MLVHX
MFS Low Volatility Equity Fund
14.37%15.40%13.51%6.47%13.00%5.33%1.25%1.17%4.99%2.23%1.19%1.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLVHX and FSUVX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSUVX has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to MLVHX (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLVHX dropped -34.14% vs FSUVX's -32.41%.

FSUVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLVHX and FSUVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer