MLVHX vs. FSKAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MLVHX (MFS Low Volatility Equity Fund) and FSKAX (Fidelity Total Market Index Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MLVHX returned 10.48%/yr vs 15.09%/yr for FSKAX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MLVHX charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for FSKAX.

Performance

MLVHX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Low Volatility Equity Fund (MLVHX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLVHX achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than FSKAX's 12.08% return. Over the past 10 years, MLVHX has underperformed FSKAX with an annualized return of 10.48%, while FSKAX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.09% annualized return.

MLVHX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -0.94%
• YTD: 1.41%
• 6M: 1.40%
• 1Y: 7.97%
• 3Y*: 11.23%
• 5Y*: 7.76%
• 10Y*: 10.48%

FSKAX

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 5.80%
• YTD: 12.08%
• 6M: 11.98%
• 1Y: 29.13%
• 3Y*: 22.42%
• 5Y*: 13.08%
• 10Y*: 15.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLVHX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MLVHX MFS Low Volatility Equity Fund	1.41%	9.96%	13.91%	12.40%	-10.84%	25.42%	11.63%	27.17%	-1.22%	16.17%
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund	12.08%	17.06%	23.89%	26.12%	-19.53%	25.66%	20.79%	30.92%	-5.32%	20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between MLVHX and FSKAX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2013	0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between MLVHX and FSKAX has dropped to 0.63 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

MLVHX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLVHX

MLVHX Risk / Return Rank: 11
MLVHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
MLVHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
MLVHX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
MLVHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
MLVHX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

FSKAX

FSKAX Risk / Return Rank: 71
FSKAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FSKAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FSKAX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FSKAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FSKAX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLVHX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Low Volatility Equity Fund (MLVHX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MLVHX	FSKAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	2.46	-1.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.32	3.35	-2.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.44	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.99	3.38	-2.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.32	15.52	-12.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MLVHX vs. FSKAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLVHX Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the FSKAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLVHX and FSKAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MLVHX	FSKAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86	2.46	-1.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	0.76	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65	0.82	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.85	-0.18

Drawdowns

MLVHX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLVHX drawdown since its inception was -34.14%, roughly equal to the maximum FSKAX drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLVHX and FSKAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLVHX	FSKAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.14%	-35.01%	+0.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.30%	-8.92%	+0.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.92%	-19.43%	-1.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.92%	-25.39%	+4.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.14%	-35.01%	+0.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.47%	0.00%	-4.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.90%	-4.02%	+0.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.47%	1.94%	+0.53%

Volatility

MLVHX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Low Volatility Equity Fund (MLVHX) is 2.28%, while Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) has a volatility of 2.97%. This indicates that MLVHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLVHX	FSKAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.28%	2.97%	-0.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.00%	9.23%	-2.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.52%	12.26%	-2.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.23%	17.41%	-2.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.22%	18.46%	-2.24%

MLVHX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLVHX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLVHX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison

MLVHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.19%, more than FSKAX's 0.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund	0.93%	1.01%	1.19%	1.41%	1.62%	1.15%	1.45%	1.94%	2.54%	2.07%	2.43%	0.82%
MLVHX MFS Low Volatility Equity Fund	15.19%	15.40%	13.51%	6.47%	13.00%	5.33%	1.25%	1.17%	4.99%	2.23%	1.19%	1.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLVHX and FSKAX in my portfolio?

MLVHX and FSKAX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MLVHX or FSKAX?

FSKAX has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to MLVHX (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLVHX dropped -34.14% vs FSKAX's -35.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSKAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.