PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLTIX vs. MEIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLTIX vs. MEIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Lifetime 2030 Fund (MLTIX) and MFS Value Fund Class I (MEIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLTIX achieves a 4.71% return, which is significantly lower than MEIIX's 6.49% return. Over the past 10 years, MLTIX has underperformed MEIIX with an annualized return of 7.98%, while MEIIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.13% annualized return.


MLTIX

1D
0.42%
1M
1.15%
YTD
4.71%
6M
4.62%
1Y
11.42%
3Y*
9.90%
5Y*
5.22%
10Y*
7.98%

MEIIX

1D
-0.26%
1M
1.33%
YTD
6.49%
6M
5.75%
1Y
15.99%
3Y*
12.92%
5Y*
9.03%
10Y*
10.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLTIX vs. MEIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLTIX
MFS Lifetime 2030 Fund
4.71%10.82%8.32%12.48%-13.80%12.81%11.85%21.98%-5.66%17.21%
MEIIX
MFS Value Fund Class I
6.49%13.26%11.86%8.21%-6.02%25.43%3.99%30.04%-9.90%17.20%

Correlation

The correlation between MLTIX and MEIIX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2005

0.89

The correlation between MLTIX and MEIIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLTIX vs. MEIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLTIX
MLTIX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
MLTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
MLTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

MEIIX
MEIIX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
MEIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MEIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLTIX vs. MEIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Lifetime 2030 Fund (MLTIX) and MFS Value Fund Class I (MEIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MLTIXMEIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.27

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

2.39

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.96

8.24

+2.72

MLTIX vs. MEIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLTIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the MEIIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLTIX and MEIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MLTIX vs. MEIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLTIX drawdown since its inception was -52.93%, roughly equal to the maximum MEIIX drawdown of -52.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLTIX and MEIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLTIXMEIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.93%

-52.64%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.51%

-6.76%

+2.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.07%

-13.19%

+6.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.27%

-17.58%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.17%

-36.70%

+11.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-1.42%

+1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.25%

-6.54%

+0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

1.96%

-0.92%

Volatility

MLTIX vs. MEIIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Lifetime 2030 Fund (MLTIX) is 2.03%, while MFS Value Fund Class I (MEIIX) has a volatility of 3.21%. This indicates that MLTIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MEIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLTIXMEIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.03%

3.21%

-1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.45%

7.88%

-3.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.49%

10.64%

-5.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.28%

13.94%

-5.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.90%

16.57%

-6.67%

MLTIX vs. MEIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLTIX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than MEIIX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLTIX vs. MEIIX - Dividend Comparison

MLTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.68%, less than MEIIX's 9.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MEIIX
MFS Value Fund Class I
9.13%9.52%9.30%8.41%7.58%3.32%2.63%3.17%3.62%4.04%2.91%5.97%
MLTIX
MFS Lifetime 2030 Fund
8.68%9.09%8.22%3.98%6.47%8.95%3.92%5.46%5.72%3.85%7.14%3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLTIX and MEIIX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MEIIX has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to MLTIX (2.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLTIX dropped -52.93% vs MEIIX's -52.64%.

MLTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLTIX and MEIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer