PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLTIX vs. FNSDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLTIX vs. FNSDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Lifetime 2030 Fund (MLTIX) and Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K (FNSDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLTIX achieves a 4.40% return, which is significantly lower than FNSDX's 13.20% return.


MLTIX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.22%
YTD
4.40%
6M
4.97%
1Y
11.84%
3Y*
10.39%
5Y*
5.01%
10Y*
7.91%

FNSDX

1D
0.29%
1M
4.05%
YTD
13.20%
6M
15.53%
1Y
30.90%
3Y*
20.56%
5Y*
10.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLTIX vs. FNSDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLTIX
MFS Lifetime 2030 Fund
4.40%10.82%8.32%12.48%-13.80%12.81%11.85%21.98%-5.66%6.04%
FNSDX
Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K
13.20%23.81%14.18%20.65%-18.23%16.65%18.34%25.58%-8.85%7.42%

Correlation

The correlation between MLTIX and FNSDX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017

0.94

The correlation between MLTIX and FNSDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLTIX vs. FNSDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLTIX
MLTIX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
MLTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
MLTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

FNSDX
FNSDX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FNSDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNSDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNSDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FNSDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNSDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLTIX vs. FNSDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Lifetime 2030 Fund (MLTIX) and Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K (FNSDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLTIXFNSDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.29

2.50

-0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.37

3.43

-0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.46

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

3.27

-0.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.70

14.60

-2.90

MLTIX vs. FNSDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLTIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the FNSDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLTIX and FNSDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLTIXFNSDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

2.50

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.69

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.74

-0.27

Drawdowns

MLTIX vs. FNSDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLTIX drawdown since its inception was -52.93%, which is greater than FNSDX's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLTIX and FNSDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLTIXFNSDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.93%

-30.95%

-21.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.51%

-9.76%

+5.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.07%

-15.44%

+8.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.27%

-27.31%

+8.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.26%

-5.61%

-0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

2.19%

-1.16%

Volatility

MLTIX vs. FNSDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Lifetime 2030 Fund (MLTIX) is 1.64%, while Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K (FNSDX) has a volatility of 4.26%. This indicates that MLTIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNSDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLTIXFNSDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.64%

4.26%

-2.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.17%

10.56%

-6.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.26%

12.80%

-7.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.25%

15.03%

-6.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.90%

15.98%

-6.08%

MLTIX vs. FNSDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLTIX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FNSDX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLTIX vs. FNSDX - Dividend Comparison

MLTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.71%, more than FNSDX's 5.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNSDX
Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K
5.00%3.87%2.13%2.07%11.45%11.27%4.26%6.31%6.79%2.72%0.00%0.00%
MLTIX
MFS Lifetime 2030 Fund
8.71%9.09%8.22%3.98%6.47%8.95%3.92%5.46%5.72%3.85%7.14%3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, MLTIX and FNSDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FNSDX has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to MLTIX (1.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLTIX dropped -52.93% vs FNSDX's -30.95%.

FNSDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLTIX and FNSDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer