MLPS.L vs. FWRG.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MLPS.L (Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF) and FWRG.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - MLPS.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while FWRG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MLPS.L returned 16.47% vs 30.35% for FWRG.L. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MLPS.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FWRG.L.

Performance

MLPS.L vs. FWRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPS.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPS.L achieves a 19.52% return, which is significantly higher than FWRG.L's 11.97% return.

MLPS.L

• 1D: 1.18%
• 1M: 0.77%
• YTD: 19.52%
• 6M: 16.56%
• 1Y: 16.47%
• 3Y*: 19.21%
• 5Y*: 17.43%
• 10Y*: 7.33%

FWRG.L

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 5.96%
• YTD: 11.97%
• 6M: 12.52%
• 1Y: 30.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPS.L vs. FWRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MLPS.L Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF	19.52%	2.44%	22.62%	12.00%
FWRG.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc	11.97%	13.84%	20.11%	8.08%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPS.L and FWRG.L is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023	0.24

The correlation between MLPS.L and FWRG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MLPS.L vs. FWRG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MLPS.L	FWRG.L
Energy	96.7%	4.3%
Utilities	3.2%	2.6%
Industrials	0.2%	11.0%
Basic Materials	-	3.9%
Communication Services	-	8.9%
Consumer Cyclical	-	9.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	5.0%
Financial Services	-	16.4%
Healthcare	-	7.6%
Real Estate	-	1.9%
Technology	-	29.1%

Return for Risk

MLPS.L vs. FWRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPS.L

MLPS.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
MLPS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
MLPS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
MLPS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 29
MLPS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
MLPS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33

FWRG.L

FWRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 85
FWRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
FWRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
FWRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
FWRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FWRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPS.L vs. FWRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPS.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MLPS.L	FWRG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.16	2.93	-1.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.63	4.06	-2.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.56	-0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	4.23	-2.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.03	17.11	-12.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MLPS.L vs. FWRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the FWRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPS.L and FWRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MLPS.L	FWRG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.16	2.93	-1.77
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.26	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	1.51	-1.36

Drawdowns

MLPS.L vs. FWRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPS.L drawdown since its inception was -82.23%, which is greater than FWRG.L's maximum drawdown of -18.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPS.L and FWRG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLPS.L	FWRG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.23%	-18.88%	-63.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.45%	-7.14%	-1.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.67%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-75.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.66%	-0.38%	-2.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.26%	-2.28%	-25.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.27%	1.77%	+1.50%

Volatility

MLPS.L vs. FWRG.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPS.L) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L) at 2.96%. This indicates that MLPS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FWRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLPS.L	FWRG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.27%	2.96%	+2.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.77%	7.69%	+3.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.14%	10.33%	+3.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.41%	12.41%	+8.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.54%	12.41%	+16.13%

MLPS.L vs. FWRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPS.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FWRG.L's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLPS.L vs. FWRG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MLPS.L nor FWRG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLPS.L and FWRG.L in my portfolio?

MLPS.L and FWRG.L have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MLPS.L or FWRG.L?

On fees, FWRG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MLPS.L or FWRG.L?

FWRG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MLPS.L.

What is the main difference between MLPS.L and FWRG.L?

MLPS.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while FWRG.L is Global Equities. MLPS.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while FWRG.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MLPS.L and 0.15% for FWRG.L.