PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPNX vs. RYVIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPNX vs. RYVIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund (MLPNX) and Rydex Energy Services Fund (RYVIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPNX achieves a 25.47% return, which is significantly lower than RYVIX's 50.22% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPNX has outperformed RYVIX with an annualized return of 10.28%, while RYVIX has yielded a comparatively lower -1.89% annualized return.


MLPNX

1D
1.56%
1M
-1.36%
YTD
25.47%
6M
24.88%
1Y
27.98%
3Y*
31.72%
5Y*
27.12%
10Y*
10.28%

RYVIX

1D
2.41%
1M
-3.19%
YTD
50.22%
6M
44.36%
1Y
89.06%
3Y*
18.22%
5Y*
10.82%
10Y*
-1.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPNX vs. RYVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPNX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund
25.47%4.56%47.50%25.29%38.54%55.22%-45.69%8.98%-20.95%-0.65%
RYVIX
Rydex Energy Services Fund
50.22%2.29%-7.73%4.45%43.02%17.12%-36.94%-0.41%-45.58%-18.85%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPNX and RYVIX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012

0.66

The correlation between MLPNX and RYVIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.69 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPNX vs. RYVIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPNX
MLPNX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MLPNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPNX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPNX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

RYVIX
RYVIX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
RYVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
RYVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPNX vs. RYVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund (MLPNX) and Rydex Energy Services Fund (RYVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLPNXRYVIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.50

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

10.21

-6.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.55

25.93

-16.38

MLPNX vs. RYVIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is lower than the RYVIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPNX and RYVIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLPNXRYVIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

3.33

-1.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.08

0.31

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

-0.05

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.05

+0.17

Drawdowns

MLPNX vs. RYVIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPNX drawdown since its inception was -87.31%, smaller than the maximum RYVIX drawdown of -94.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPNX and RYVIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPNXRYVIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.31%

-94.06%

+6.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-9.43%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.58%

-43.86%

+24.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.27%

-43.86%

+16.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.59%

-88.04%

+4.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.69%

-67.62%

+61.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.51%

-46.18%

+20.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

3.70%

-0.59%

Volatility

MLPNX vs. RYVIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund (MLPNX) is 6.85%, while Rydex Energy Services Fund (RYVIX) has a volatility of 8.03%. This indicates that MLPNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYVIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPNXRYVIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.85%

8.03%

-1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.33%

19.79%

-7.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.54%

28.90%

-12.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.21%

35.08%

-9.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.79%

40.33%

-4.54%

MLPNX vs. RYVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPNX has a 1.34% expense ratio, which is lower than RYVIX's 1.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPNX vs. RYVIX - Dividend Comparison

MLPNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, more than RYVIX's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLPNX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund
4.56%5.31%4.14%5.58%6.44%8.34%21.57%13.90%13.34%20.56%7.75%9.09%
RYVIX
Rydex Energy Services Fund
0.36%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.30%1.30%0.11%1.48%0.88%0.71%1.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLPNX and RYVIX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYVIX has higher volatility (8.03%) compared to MLPNX (6.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPNX dropped -87.31% vs RYVIX's -94.06%.

RYVIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPNX and RYVIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer