MLPNX vs. IVNQX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

MLPNX (Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund) and IVNQX (Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund) are both mutual funds - MLPNX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Invesco, while IVNQX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Invesco. Over the past 5 years, MLPNX returned 27.39%/yr vs 15.71%/yr for IVNQX. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MLPNX charges 1.34%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for IVNQX.

Performance

MLPNX vs. IVNQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund (MLPNX) and Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (IVNQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPNX achieves a 27.66% return, which is significantly higher than IVNQX's 18.33% return.

MLPNX

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 1.19%
• 6M: 26.09%
• YTD: 27.66%
• 1Y: 30.26%
• 3Y*: 30.10%
• 5Y*: 27.39%
• 10Y*: 10.04%

IVNQX

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 0.65%
• 6M: 15.86%
• YTD: 18.33%
• 1Y: 31.36%
• 3Y*: 26.00%
• 5Y*: 15.71%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPNX vs. IVNQX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MLPNX Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund	27.66%	4.56%	47.50%	25.29%	38.54%	55.22%	21.98%
IVNQX Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund	18.33%	20.77%	25.43%	54.62%	-32.05%	26.75%	8.46%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPNX and IVNQX is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2020	0.26

The correlation between MLPNX and IVNQX shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MLPNX vs. IVNQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPNX

MLPNX Risk / Return Rank: 67
MLPNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
MLPNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
MLPNX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
MLPNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
MLPNX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

IVNQX

IVNQX Risk / Return Rank: 59
IVNQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
IVNQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
IVNQX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
IVNQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
IVNQX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPNX vs. IVNQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund (MLPNX) and Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (IVNQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MLPNX	IVNQX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	1.70	+0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.52	2.28	+0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.30	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.50	2.62	+0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.60	9.43	-0.83

MLPNX vs. IVNQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the IVNQX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPNX and IVNQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MLPNX vs. IVNQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPNX drawdown since its inception was -87.31%, which is greater than IVNQX's maximum drawdown of -34.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPNX and IVNQX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLPNX	IVNQX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.31%	-34.83%	-52.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.89%	-11.95%	+3.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.58%	-22.70%	+3.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.27%	-34.83%	+7.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-83.59%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.04%	-2.67%	-1.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.36%	-8.14%	-17.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.61%	3.31%	+0.30%

Volatility

MLPNX vs. IVNQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund (MLPNX) is 6.09%, while Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (IVNQX) has a volatility of 8.43%. This indicates that MLPNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVNQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLPNX	IVNQX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.09%	8.43%	-2.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.75%	15.13%	-2.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.78%	18.46%	-1.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.96%	22.86%	+2.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.68%	22.58%	+13.10%

MLPNX vs. IVNQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPNX has a 1.34% expense ratio, which is higher than IVNQX's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLPNX vs. IVNQX - Dividend Comparison

MLPNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, more than IVNQX's 1.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IVNQX Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund	1.11%	1.31%	0.72%	0.54%	0.73%	0.84%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MLPNX Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund	4.61%	5.31%	4.14%	5.58%	6.44%	8.34%	21.57%	13.90%	13.34%	20.56%	7.75%	9.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLPNX and IVNQX in my portfolio?

MLPNX and IVNQX have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MLPNX or IVNQX?

IVNQX has higher volatility (8.43%) compared to MLPNX (6.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPNX dropped -87.31% vs IVNQX's -34.83%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MLPNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.