MLPNX vs. AIFRX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MLPNX (Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund) and AIFRX (abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MLPNX returned 10.28%/yr vs 10.24%/yr for AIFRX. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MLPNX charges 1.34%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AIFRX.

Performance

MLPNX vs. AIFRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund (MLPNX) and abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund (AIFRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPNX achieves a 25.47% return, which is significantly higher than AIFRX's 11.91% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MLPNX having a 10.28% annualized return and AIFRX not far behind at 10.24%.

MLPNX

• 1D: 1.56%
• 1M: -1.36%
• YTD: 25.47%
• 6M: 24.88%
• 1Y: 27.98%
• 3Y*: 31.72%
• 5Y*: 27.12%
• 10Y*: 10.28%

AIFRX

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: -1.41%
• YTD: 11.91%
• 6M: 12.14%
• 1Y: 20.46%
• 3Y*: 16.00%
• 5Y*: 9.50%
• 10Y*: 10.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPNX vs. AIFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MLPNX Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund	25.47%	4.56%	47.50%	25.29%	38.54%	55.22%	-45.69%	8.98%	-20.95%	-0.65%
AIFRX abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund	11.91%	26.92%	2.88%	13.10%	-7.95%	15.61%	1.87%	28.41%	-9.31%	25.24%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPNX and AIFRX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012	0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between MLPNX and AIFRX has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

MLPNX vs. AIFRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPNX

MLPNX Risk / Return Rank: 45
MLPNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
MLPNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
MLPNX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
MLPNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
MLPNX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

AIFRX

AIFRX Risk / Return Rank: 53
AIFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
AIFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
AIFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
AIFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
AIFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPNX vs. AIFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund (MLPNX) and abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund (AIFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MLPNX	AIFRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	2.03	-0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.42	2.84	-0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.36	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.36	3.17	+0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.55	11.90	-2.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MLPNX vs. AIFRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the AIFRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPNX and AIFRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MLPNX	AIFRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.81	2.03	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.08	0.68	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29	0.65	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.71	-0.49

Drawdowns

MLPNX vs. AIFRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPNX drawdown since its inception was -87.31%, which is greater than AIFRX's maximum drawdown of -38.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPNX and AIFRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLPNX	AIFRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.31%	-38.38%	-48.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.89%	-6.42%	-2.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.58%	-15.76%	-3.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.27%	-22.75%	-4.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-83.59%	-38.38%	-45.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.69%	-3.01%	-2.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.51%	-5.46%	-20.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.11%	1.71%	+1.40%

Volatility

MLPNX vs. AIFRX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund (MLPNX) has a higher volatility of 6.85% compared to abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund (AIFRX) at 3.33%. This indicates that MLPNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLPNX	AIFRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.85%	3.33%	+3.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.33%	8.22%	+4.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.54%	10.08%	+6.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.21%	14.03%	+11.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.79%	15.87%	+19.92%

MLPNX vs. AIFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPNX has a 1.34% expense ratio, which is higher than AIFRX's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLPNX vs. AIFRX - Dividend Comparison

MLPNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, less than AIFRX's 7.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AIFRX abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund	7.02%	7.80%	8.13%	3.46%	4.86%	5.31%	3.45%	4.01%	3.96%	3.80%	4.37%	4.55%
MLPNX Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund	4.56%	5.31%	4.14%	5.58%	6.44%	8.34%	21.57%	13.90%	13.34%	20.56%	7.75%	9.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLPNX and AIFRX in my portfolio?

MLPNX and AIFRX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MLPNX or AIFRX?

MLPNX has higher volatility (6.85%) compared to AIFRX (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPNX dropped -87.31% vs AIFRX's -38.38%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.