MLPNX vs. ACSTX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MLPNX (Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund) and ACSTX (Invesco Comstock Fund) are both mutual funds - MLPNX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Invesco, while ACSTX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Invesco. Over the past 10 years, MLPNX returned 10.28%/yr vs 12.56%/yr for ACSTX. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MLPNX charges 1.34%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for ACSTX.

Performance

MLPNX vs. ACSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund (MLPNX) and Invesco Comstock Fund (ACSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPNX achieves a 25.47% return, which is significantly higher than ACSTX's 9.14% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPNX has underperformed ACSTX with an annualized return of 10.28%, while ACSTX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.56% annualized return.

MLPNX

• 1D: 1.56%
• 1M: -1.36%
• YTD: 25.47%
• 6M: 24.88%
• 1Y: 27.98%
• 3Y*: 31.72%
• 5Y*: 27.12%
• 10Y*: 10.28%

ACSTX

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 3.08%
• YTD: 9.14%
• 6M: 10.66%
• 1Y: 23.62%
• 3Y*: 18.06%
• 5Y*: 11.69%
• 10Y*: 12.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPNX vs. ACSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MLPNX Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund	25.47%	4.56%	47.50%	25.29%	38.54%	55.22%	-45.69%	8.98%	-20.95%	-0.65%
ACSTX Invesco Comstock Fund	9.14%	17.22%	15.00%	12.37%	0.74%	33.33%	-0.78%	24.35%	-12.34%	17.75%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPNX and ACSTX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012	0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between MLPNX and ACSTX has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

MLPNX vs. ACSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPNX

MLPNX Risk / Return Rank: 45
MLPNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
MLPNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
MLPNX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
MLPNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
MLPNX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

ACSTX

ACSTX Risk / Return Rank: 59
ACSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
ACSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
ACSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
ACSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
ACSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPNX vs. ACSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund (MLPNX) and Invesco Comstock Fund (ACSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MLPNX	ACSTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	2.27	-0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.42	3.27	-0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.41	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.36	3.06	+0.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.55	11.64	-2.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MLPNX vs. ACSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the ACSTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPNX and ACSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MLPNX	ACSTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.81	2.27	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.08	0.76	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29	0.65	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.51	-0.29

Drawdowns

MLPNX vs. ACSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPNX drawdown since its inception was -87.31%, which is greater than ACSTX's maximum drawdown of -58.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPNX and ACSTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLPNX	ACSTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.31%	-58.61%	-28.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.89%	-8.02%	-0.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.58%	-15.61%	-3.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.27%	-17.25%	-10.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-83.59%	-44.80%	-38.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.69%	-0.24%	-5.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.51%	-9.35%	-16.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.11%	2.10%	+1.01%

Volatility

MLPNX vs. ACSTX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund (MLPNX) has a higher volatility of 6.85% compared to Invesco Comstock Fund (ACSTX) at 2.48%. This indicates that MLPNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLPNX	ACSTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.85%	2.48%	+4.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.33%	8.01%	+4.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.54%	10.84%	+5.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.21%	15.41%	+9.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.79%	19.46%	+16.33%

MLPNX vs. ACSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPNX has a 1.34% expense ratio, which is higher than ACSTX's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLPNX vs. ACSTX - Dividend Comparison

MLPNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, less than ACSTX's 8.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACSTX Invesco Comstock Fund	8.10%	8.79%	10.17%	8.44%	13.00%	8.66%	2.05%	6.66%	10.03%	3.60%	6.98%	1.10%
MLPNX Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund	4.56%	5.31%	4.14%	5.58%	6.44%	8.34%	21.57%	13.90%	13.34%	20.56%	7.75%	9.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLPNX and ACSTX in my portfolio?

MLPNX and ACSTX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MLPNX or ACSTX?

MLPNX has higher volatility (6.85%) compared to ACSTX (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPNX dropped -87.31% vs ACSTX's -58.61%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACSTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.