PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPLX vs. VADDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPLX vs. VADDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund Class A (MLPLX) and Invesco Equally-Weighted S&P 500 Fund (VADDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPLX achieves a 30.97% return, which is significantly higher than VADDX's 13.28% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPLX has underperformed VADDX with an annualized return of 9.46%, while VADDX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.61% annualized return.


MLPLX

1D
0.27%
1M
4.79%
6M
20.54%
YTD
30.97%
1Y
32.27%
3Y*
29.36%
5Y*
29.67%
10Y*
9.46%
ALL TIME*
6.58%

VADDX

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.16%
6M
9.58%
YTD
13.28%
1Y
20.46%
3Y*
13.37%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*
11.61%
ALL TIME*
9.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MLPLX vs. VADDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPLX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund Class A
30.97%4.36%47.10%25.02%38.31%55.18%-46.03%8.79%-21.09%-11.18%
VADDX
Invesco Equally-Weighted S&P 500 Fund
13.28%11.16%12.68%13.58%-11.86%29.27%12.56%28.92%-7.96%18.55%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPLX and VADDX is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2011

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between MLPLX and VADDX has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPLX vs. VADDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MLPLX
MLPLX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
MLPLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPLX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

VADDX
VADDX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VADDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VADDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VADDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VADDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VADDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MLPLX vs. VADDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund Class A (MLPLX) and Invesco Equally-Weighted S&P 500 Fund (VADDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MLPLXVADDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.27

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

2.31

+1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.82

8.94

-0.12

MLPLX vs. VADDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the VADDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPLX and VADDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MLPLX vs. VADDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPLX drawdown since its inception was -88.76%, which is greater than VADDX's maximum drawdown of -60.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPLX and VADDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPLXVADDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.76%

-60.12%

-28.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.56%

-7.88%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.55%

-17.86%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.21%

-21.58%

-5.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.02%

-39.39%

-45.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.96%

-1.06%

-0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.71%

-6.97%

-21.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

2.06%

+1.54%

Volatility

MLPLX vs. VADDX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund Class A (MLPLX) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to Invesco Equally-Weighted S&P 500 Fund (VADDX) at 2.88%. This indicates that MLPLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VADDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPLXVADDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.52%

2.88%

+2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.92%

8.56%

+4.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.69%

11.79%

+4.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.65%

16.25%

+8.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.44%

18.46%

+16.98%

MLPLX vs. VADDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPLX has a 17.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VADDX's 0.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPLX vs. VADDX - Dividend Comparison

MLPLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, less than VADDX's 8.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLPLX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund Class A
4.83%5.70%4.42%5.92%6.79%8.75%22.54%14.33%13.67%9.68%7.88%9.20%
VADDX
Invesco Equally-Weighted S&P 500 Fund
8.91%10.09%8.88%4.86%8.45%9.92%6.38%4.68%7.13%2.97%0.30%2.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLPLX and VADDX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MLPLX has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to VADDX (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPLX dropped -88.76% vs VADDX's -60.12%.

MLPLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPLX and VADDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer