PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPIX vs. RSVAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPIX vs. RSVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund (MLPIX) and Victory RS Value Fund (RSVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPIX achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly higher than RSVAX's 5.96% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPIX has underperformed RSVAX with an annualized return of 8.65%, while RSVAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.13% annualized return.


MLPIX

1D
1.03%
1M
2.02%
YTD
8.56%
6M
8.62%
1Y
19.28%
3Y*
12.01%
5Y*
5.78%
10Y*
8.65%

RSVAX

1D
0.32%
1M
-0.90%
YTD
5.96%
6M
6.01%
1Y
11.81%
3Y*
10.38%
5Y*
6.25%
10Y*
9.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPIX vs. RSVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPIX
ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund
8.56%5.48%9.65%13.32%-8.61%28.23%1.85%24.02%-13.08%10.45%
RSVAX
Victory RS Value Fund
5.96%4.58%12.58%7.63%-2.98%27.30%-2.60%31.36%-10.84%17.37%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPIX and RSVAX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2001

0.89

The correlation between MLPIX and RSVAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPIX vs. RSVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPIX
MLPIX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
MLPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

RSVAX
RSVAX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
RSVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
RSVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPIX vs. RSVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund (MLPIX) and Victory RS Value Fund (RSVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLPIXRSVAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.18

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

1.61

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.60

5.50

+1.10

MLPIX vs. RSVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is higher than the RSVAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPIX and RSVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLPIXRSVAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

1.05

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.35

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.48

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.41

-0.06

Drawdowns

MLPIX vs. RSVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPIX drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, roughly equal to the maximum RSVAX drawdown of -59.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPIX and RSVAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPIXRSVAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.11%

-59.23%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.68%

-7.81%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.24%

-17.98%

-5.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.24%

-23.58%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.96%

-43.49%

-2.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-2.19%

+1.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.37%

-13.82%

+4.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

2.28%

+0.88%

Volatility

MLPIX vs. RSVAX - Volatility Comparison

ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund (MLPIX) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to Victory RS Value Fund (RSVAX) at 3.03%. This indicates that MLPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPIXRSVAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

3.03%

+0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.47%

8.44%

+2.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.10%

11.92%

+3.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.49%

18.10%

+1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.40%

19.20%

+2.20%

MLPIX vs. RSVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPIX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than RSVAX's 1.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPIX vs. RSVAX - Dividend Comparison

MLPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than RSVAX's 8.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLPIX
ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund
0.43%0.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.89%0.22%0.40%3.92%10.95%0.56%0.00%
RSVAX
Victory RS Value Fund
8.33%8.83%9.89%6.48%6.33%14.14%1.93%7.38%15.47%25.04%12.47%9.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, MLPIX and RSVAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MLPIX has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to RSVAX (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPIX dropped -60.11% vs RSVAX's -59.23%.

MLPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPIX and RSVAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer