MLPIX vs. MLPI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MLPIX (ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund) and MLPI (Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF) are both funds - MLPIX is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund managed by ProFunds, while MLPI is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Neos. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. MLPIX charges 1.78%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for MLPI.

Performance

MLPIX vs. MLPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund (MLPIX) and Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPIX achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly lower than MLPI's 17.58% return.

MLPIX

• 1D: 1.03%
• 1M: 2.02%
• YTD: 8.56%
• 6M: 8.62%
• 1Y: 19.28%
• 3Y*: 12.01%
• 5Y*: 5.78%
• 10Y*: 8.65%

MLPI

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -3.13%
• YTD: 17.58%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPIX vs. MLPI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MLPIX ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund	8.56%	-0.88%
MLPI Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	17.58%	0.56%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPIX and MLPI is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2025	-0.01

Return for Risk

MLPIX vs. MLPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPIX

MLPIX Risk / Return Rank: 25
MLPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
MLPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
MLPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
MLPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
MLPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPIX vs. MLPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund (MLPIX) and Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MLPIX	MLPI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.39	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.10	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.96	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.60	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MLPIX	MLPI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.39	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	3.49	-3.14

Drawdowns

MLPIX vs. MLPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPIX drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, which is greater than MLPI's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPIX and MLPI.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLPIX	MLPI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.11%	-5.38%	-54.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.47%	-3.84%	+3.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.37%	-1.27%	-8.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.16%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MLPIX	MLPI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.00%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.47%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.10%	13.05%	+2.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.49%	13.05%	+6.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.40%	13.05%	+8.35%

MLPIX vs. MLPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPIX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLPIX vs. MLPI - Dividend Comparison

MLPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than MLPI's 6.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
MLPI Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	6.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MLPIX ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund	0.43%	0.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.89%	0.22%	0.40%	3.92%	10.95%	0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLPIX and MLPI in my portfolio?

MLPIX and MLPI have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.