PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPIX vs. FRNKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPIX vs. FRNKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund (MLPIX) and Frank Value Fund (FRNKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPIX achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly lower than FRNKX's 10.33% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPIX has outperformed FRNKX with an annualized return of 8.65%, while FRNKX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.82% annualized return.


MLPIX

1D
1.03%
1M
2.02%
YTD
8.56%
6M
8.62%
1Y
19.28%
3Y*
12.01%
5Y*
5.78%
10Y*
8.65%

FRNKX

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.23%
YTD
10.33%
6M
9.98%
1Y
16.89%
3Y*
17.69%
5Y*
11.72%
10Y*
7.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPIX vs. FRNKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPIX
ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund
8.56%5.48%9.65%13.32%-8.61%28.23%1.85%24.02%-13.08%10.45%
FRNKX
Frank Value Fund
10.33%12.05%19.31%14.88%4.23%6.46%12.84%4.15%-2.24%-2.81%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPIX and FRNKX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2004

0.78

The correlation between MLPIX and FRNKX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (10 years) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPIX vs. FRNKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPIX
MLPIX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
MLPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

FRNKX
FRNKX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FRNKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRNKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRNKX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
FRNKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRNKX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPIX vs. FRNKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund (MLPIX) and Frank Value Fund (FRNKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLPIXFRNKXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.39

1.15

+0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.10

1.70

+0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.20

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

2.46

-0.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.60

6.31

+0.29

MLPIX vs. FRNKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the FRNKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPIX and FRNKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLPIXFRNKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

1.15

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.01

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.01

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.01

+0.33

Drawdowns

MLPIX vs. FRNKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPIX drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, smaller than the maximum FRNKX drawdown of -97.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPIX and FRNKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPIXFRNKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.11%

-97.09%

+36.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.68%

-6.95%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.24%

-97.09%

+73.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.24%

-97.09%

+73.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.96%

-97.09%

+51.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-95.87%

+95.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.37%

-12.02%

+2.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

2.71%

+0.45%

Volatility

MLPIX vs. FRNKX - Volatility Comparison

ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund (MLPIX) and Frank Value Fund (FRNKX) have volatilities of 4.00% and 3.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPIXFRNKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

3.96%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.47%

10.57%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.10%

14.90%

+0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.49%

1,805.06%

-1,785.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.40%

1,276.60%

-1,255.20%

MLPIX vs. FRNKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPIX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than FRNKX's 1.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPIX vs. FRNKX - Dividend Comparison

MLPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than FRNKX's 10.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRNKX
Frank Value Fund
10.86%11.98%4.63%10.14%8.10%4.93%0.00%0.23%3.23%0.00%3.00%7.64%
MLPIX
ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund
0.43%0.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.89%0.22%0.40%3.92%10.95%0.56%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLPIX and FRNKX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MLPIX has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to FRNKX (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPIX dropped -60.11% vs FRNKX's -97.09%.

MLPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPIX and FRNKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer