MLPI vs. WEEI
MLPI (NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF) and WEEI (Westwood Salient Enhanced Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MLPI is a MLPs fund actively managed by NEOS, while WEEI is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Westwood. Both are actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MLPI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for WEEI.
Performance
MLPI vs. WEEI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPI achieves a 19.61% return, which is significantly higher than WEEI's 12.67% return.
MLPI
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -2.18%
- YTD
- 19.61%
- 6M
- 18.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WEEI
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -6.17%
- YTD
- 12.67%
- 6M
- 13.31%
- 1Y
- 22.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MLPI vs. WEEI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MLPI NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF | 19.61% | 0.36% |
WEEI Westwood Salient Enhanced Energy Income ETF | 12.67% | 1.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPI and WEEI is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLPI vs. WEEI — Risk / Return Rank
MLPI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
WEEI
MLPI vs. WEEI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI) and Westwood Salient Enhanced Energy Income ETF (WEEI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MLPI | WEEI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.37 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.14 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MLPI vs. WEEI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPI drawdown since its inception was -5.38%, smaller than the maximum WEEI drawdown of -18.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPI and WEEI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPI | WEEI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -18.78% | +13.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.18% | -7.81% | +5.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.49% | -4.20% | +2.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.75% | — |
Volatility
MLPI vs. WEEI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLPI | WEEI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.77% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.17% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.05% | 14.46% | -1.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.05% | 18.36% | -5.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.05% | 18.36% | -5.31% |
MLPI vs. WEEI - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than WEEI's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
MLPI vs. WEEI - Dividend Comparison
MLPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.19%, less than WEEI's 11.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MLPI NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF | 7.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WEEI Westwood Salient Enhanced Energy Income ETF | 11.84% | 12.59% | 7.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MLPI and WEEI have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MLPI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MLPI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for WEEI.
WEEI has the higher dividend yield at 11.84%, compared with 7.19% for MLPI.
MLPI is categorized as MLPs, while WEEI is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: NEOS and Westwood. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for MLPI and 0.85% for WEEI.
Find the right allocation for MLPI and WEEI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer