MLPI vs. VTEB
MLPI (NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF) and VTEB (Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MLPI is a MLPs fund actively managed by NEOS, while VTEB is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the S&P National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index. MLPI is actively managed, while VTEB is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions. MLPI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTEB.
Performance
MLPI vs. VTEB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPI achieves a 19.61% return, which is significantly higher than VTEB's 1.70% return.
MLPI
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -2.18%
- YTD
- 19.61%
- 6M
- 18.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTEB
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 1.70%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- 6.65%
- 3Y*
- 3.38%
- 5Y*
- 0.95%
- 10Y*
- 1.97%
MLPI vs. VTEB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MLPI NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF | 19.61% | 0.36% |
VTEB Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 1.70% | 0.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPI and VTEB is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | -0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLPI vs. VTEB — Risk / Return Rank
MLPI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VTEB
MLPI vs. VTEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI) and Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MLPI | VTEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.54 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.47 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.69 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MLPI vs. VTEB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPI drawdown since its inception was -5.38%, smaller than the maximum VTEB drawdown of -17.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPI and VTEB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPI | VTEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -17.00% | +11.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -12.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.18% | -0.28% | -1.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.49% | -2.32% | +0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.77% | — |
Volatility
MLPI vs. VTEB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLPI | VTEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.72% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.06% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.05% | 2.68% | +10.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.05% | 3.90% | +9.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.05% | 5.25% | +7.80% |
MLPI vs. VTEB - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than VTEB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
MLPI vs. VTEB - Dividend Comparison
MLPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.19%, more than VTEB's 3.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPI NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF | 7.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTEB Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 3.35% | 3.29% | 3.14% | 2.79% | 2.09% | 1.64% | 1.99% | 2.30% | 2.25% | 1.96% | 1.66% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MLPI and VTEB have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTEB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTEB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MLPI.
MLPI has the higher dividend yield at 7.19%, compared with 3.35% for VTEB.
MLPI is categorized as MLPs, while VTEB is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: NEOS and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for MLPI and 0.03% for VTEB.
Find the right allocation for MLPI and VTEB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer