MLPI vs. VDE
MLPI (NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF) and VDE (Vanguard Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MLPI is a MLPs fund actively managed by NEOS, while VDE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. MLPI is actively managed, while VDE is passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MLPI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VDE.
Performance
MLPI vs. VDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPI achieves a 19.61% return, which is significantly lower than VDE's 23.55% return.
MLPI
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -2.18%
- YTD
- 19.61%
- 6M
- 18.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VDE
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -7.94%
- YTD
- 23.55%
- 6M
- 24.06%
- 1Y
- 31.01%
- 3Y*
- 16.13%
- 5Y*
- 18.74%
- 10Y*
- 8.90%
MLPI vs. VDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MLPI NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF | 19.61% | 0.36% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 23.55% | 0.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPI and VDE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLPI vs. VDE — Risk / Return Rank
MLPI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VDE
MLPI vs. VDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI) and Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MLPI | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.19 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.75 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MLPI vs. VDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPI drawdown since its inception was -5.38%, smaller than the maximum VDE drawdown of -74.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPI and VDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPI | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -74.20% | +68.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -69.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.18% | -12.59% | +10.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.49% | -19.94% | +18.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.61% | — |
Volatility
MLPI vs. VDE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLPI | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.06% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.61% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.05% | 20.80% | -7.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.05% | 26.37% | -13.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.05% | 29.94% | -16.89% |
MLPI vs. VDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than VDE's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
MLPI vs. VDE - Dividend Comparison
MLPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.19%, more than VDE's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPI NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF | 7.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 2.54% | 3.11% | 3.23% | 3.34% | 3.65% | 4.13% | 4.76% | 3.42% | 3.35% | 2.90% | 2.31% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MLPI and VDE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VDE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VDE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MLPI.
MLPI has the higher dividend yield at 7.19%, compared with 2.54% for VDE.
MLPI is categorized as MLPs, while VDE is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: NEOS and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for MLPI and 0.09% for VDE.
Find the right allocation for MLPI and VDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer