PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPFX vs. VAFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPFX vs. VAFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 Fund Class A (MLPFX) and Invesco American Franchise Fund Class A (VAFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPFX achieves a 21.14% return, which is significantly higher than VAFAX's 8.55% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPFX has underperformed VAFAX with an annualized return of 10.04%, while VAFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.82% annualized return.


MLPFX

1D
0.47%
1M
-1.94%
YTD
21.14%
6M
22.36%
1Y
25.25%
3Y*
25.73%
5Y*
20.81%
10Y*
10.04%

VAFAX

1D
0.52%
1M
5.21%
YTD
8.55%
6M
7.80%
1Y
22.63%
3Y*
22.88%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
15.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPFX vs. VAFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPFX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 Fund Class A
21.14%8.22%29.99%22.47%21.84%39.44%-25.43%6.90%-9.63%-4.02%
VAFAX
Invesco American Franchise Fund Class A
8.55%11.86%34.78%40.91%-31.20%11.13%42.15%36.55%-3.99%27.11%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPFX and VAFAX is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2010

0.41

Over the past year, the correlation between MLPFX and VAFAX has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPFX vs. VAFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPFX
MLPFX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
MLPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

VAFAX
VAFAX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
VAFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
VAFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPFX vs. VAFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 Fund Class A (MLPFX) and Invesco American Franchise Fund Class A (VAFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLPFXVAFAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.12

1.24

+0.88

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.88

1.73

+1.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.22

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

1.23

+2.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.80

3.73

+9.07

MLPFX vs. VAFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the VAFAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPFX and VAFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLPFXVAFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

1.24

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.17

0.46

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.71

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.57

-0.20

Drawdowns

MLPFX vs. VAFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPFX drawdown since its inception was -76.01%, which is greater than VAFAX's maximum drawdown of -48.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPFX and VAFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPFXVAFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.01%

-48.48%

-27.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.68%

-19.27%

+12.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.55%

-27.24%

+12.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.81%

-38.86%

+20.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.18%

-38.86%

-33.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.24%

-0.54%

-5.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.08%

-8.13%

-4.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

6.35%

-4.36%

Volatility

MLPFX vs. VAFAX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 Fund Class A (MLPFX) and Invesco American Franchise Fund Class A (VAFAX) have volatilities of 5.09% and 4.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPFXVAFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.09%

4.91%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.37%

14.65%

-5.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.63%

19.23%

-6.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.85%

23.05%

-5.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.07%

22.31%

+2.76%

MLPFX vs. VAFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPFX has a 10.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VAFAX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPFX vs. VAFAX - Dividend Comparison

MLPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, less than VAFAX's 12.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLPFX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 Fund Class A
5.31%6.11%5.29%6.54%7.34%8.29%13.36%10.42%10.09%8.35%7.41%7.84%
VAFAX
Invesco American Franchise Fund Class A
12.98%14.09%3.74%0.00%8.32%26.50%8.78%6.85%10.42%5.37%4.08%4.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLPFX and VAFAX have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MLPFX has higher volatility (5.09%) compared to VAFAX (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPFX dropped -76.01% vs VAFAX's -48.48%.

MLPFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPFX and VAFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer