PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPD vs. THTA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPD vs. THTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF (MLPD) and SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF (THTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPD achieves a 5.77% return, which is significantly lower than THTA's 9.58% return.


MLPD

1D
-0.52%
1M
0.16%
6M
3.31%
YTD
5.77%
1Y
11.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.20%

THTA

1D
0.07%
1M
1.44%
6M
7.96%
YTD
9.58%
1Y
16.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$334.42K$282.21K$276.41K
$796.37K$899.50K$774.37K

MLPD vs. THTA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MLPD
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF
5.77%11.77%9.42%
THTA
SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF
9.58%-10.24%2.47%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPD and THTA is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2024

0.18

The correlation between MLPD and THTA shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPD vs. THTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MLPD
MLPD Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
MLPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPD Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPD Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

THTA
THTA Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
THTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
THTA Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
THTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
THTA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MLPD vs. THTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF (MLPD) and SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF (THTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MLPDTHTADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.70

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

6.45

-4.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.46

47.72

-40.26

MLPD vs. THTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPD Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the THTA Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPD and THTA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MLPD vs. THTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPD drawdown since its inception was -12.90%, smaller than the maximum THTA drawdown of -31.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPD and THTA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPDTHTADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.90%

-31.41%

+18.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.80%

-2.64%

-2.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-4.42%

+2.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.11%

-7.41%

+6.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

0.36%

+1.18%

Volatility

MLPD vs. THTA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF (MLPD) is 1.93%, while SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF (THTA) has a volatility of 2.29%. This indicates that MLPD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than THTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPDTHTADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.93%

2.29%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.55%

3.85%

+1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.63%

6.19%

+1.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.17%

19.68%

-8.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.17%

19.68%

-8.51%

MLPD vs. THTA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than THTA's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPD vs. THTA - Dividend Comparison

MLPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.77%, more than THTA's 10.90% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
MLPD
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF
13.77%13.45%6.68%0.00%
THTA
SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF
10.90%12.66%12.44%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLPD and THTA have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

THTA has higher volatility (2.29%) compared to MLPD (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPD dropped -12.90% vs THTA's -31.41%.

On 1-year performance, THTA leads with 16.95% vs 11.46% for MLPD. On fees, THTA is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, MLPD has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, THTA has performed better with a 16.95% return vs 11.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

THTA is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for MLPD.

MLPD has the higher dividend yield at 13.77%, compared with 10.90% for THTA.

MLPD is categorized as Infrastructure Equities, while THTA is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Global X and SoFi. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for MLPD and 0.49% for THTA.

THTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPD and THTA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer