MLPD vs. CHPY

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MLPD (Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF) and CHPY (YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. MLPD is passively managed, while CHPY is actively managed. Over the past year, MLPD returned 15.13% vs 134.57% for CHPY. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MLPD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CHPY.

Performance

MLPD vs. CHPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF (MLPD) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPD achieves a 5.90% return, which is significantly lower than CHPY's 82.68% return.

MLPD

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: -0.92%
• YTD: 5.90%
• 6M: 6.34%
• 1Y: 15.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CHPY

• 1D: -6.97%
• 1M: 10.89%
• YTD: 82.68%
• 6M: 81.99%
• 1Y: 134.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPD vs. CHPY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MLPD Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF	5.90%	9.78%
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF	82.68%	56.76%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPD and CHPY is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025	0.12

Return for Risk

MLPD vs. CHPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPD

MLPD Risk / Return Rank: 65
MLPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
MLPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
MLPD Omega Ratio Rank: 68
MLPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
MLPD Martin Ratio Rank: 60

CHPY

CHPY Risk / Return Rank: 95
CHPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CHPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
CHPY Omega Ratio Rank: 94
CHPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CHPY Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPD vs. CHPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF (MLPD) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MLPD	CHPY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	4.16	-2.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	4.30	-1.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.64	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.16	11.13	-7.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.05	39.19	-29.14

MLPD vs. CHPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPD Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is lower than the CHPY Sharpe Ratio of 4.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPD and CHPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MLPD vs. CHPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPD drawdown since its inception was -12.90%, which is greater than CHPY's maximum drawdown of -12.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPD and CHPY.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLPD	CHPY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.90%	-12.19%	-0.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.80%	-12.17%	+7.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.11%	-6.97%	+5.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.12%	-2.14%	+1.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.51%	3.45%	-1.94%

Volatility

MLPD vs. CHPY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF (MLPD) is 3.38%, while YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) has a volatility of 19.72%. This indicates that MLPD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLPD	CHPY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.38%	19.72%	-16.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.53%	27.95%	-22.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.65%	32.57%	-24.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.35%	36.37%	-25.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.35%	36.37%	-25.02%

MLPD vs. CHPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CHPY's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLPD vs. CHPY - Dividend Comparison

MLPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.48%, less than CHPY's 29.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF	29.64%	28.19%	0.00%
MLPD Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF	13.48%	13.45%	6.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLPD and CHPY in my portfolio?

MLPD and CHPY have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MLPD or CHPY?

CHPY has higher volatility (19.72%) compared to MLPD (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPD dropped -12.90% vs CHPY's -12.19%.

Which ETF is better, MLPD or CHPY?

On 1-year performance, CHPY leads with 134.57% vs 15.13% for MLPD. On fees, MLPD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, MLPD has been the lower-risk option at 3.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MLPD or CHPY?

Over the 1-year period, CHPY has performed better with a 134.57% return vs 15.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MLPD or CHPY?

MLPD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CHPY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MLPD or CHPY?

CHPY has the higher dividend yield at 29.64%, compared with 13.48% for MLPD.

What is the main difference between MLPD and CHPY?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for MLPD and 0.99% for CHPY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.16 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.