PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPB vs. FTSD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPB vs. FTSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB) and Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPB achieves a 19.72% return, which is significantly higher than FTSD's 0.80% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPB has outperformed FTSD with an annualized return of 10.20%, while FTSD has yielded a comparatively lower 2.05% annualized return.


MLPB

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.42%
YTD
19.72%
6M
18.24%
1Y
20.60%
3Y*
22.21%
5Y*
19.42%
10Y*
10.20%

FTSD

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.80%
6M
1.30%
1Y
4.31%
3Y*
4.98%
5Y*
2.46%
10Y*
2.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPB vs. FTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPB
ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B
19.72%7.40%25.53%22.01%30.22%39.42%-30.80%5.69%-8.79%-9.71%
FTSD
Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF
0.80%5.66%5.20%4.84%-3.13%-0.90%3.13%2.40%1.64%0.63%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPB and FTSD is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015

-0.05

The correlation between MLPB and FTSD shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to -0.04 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPB vs. FTSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPB
MLPB Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
MLPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPB Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPB Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

FTSD
FTSD Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FTSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTSD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FTSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTSD Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPB vs. FTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB) and Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLPBFTSDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.54

3.30

-1.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.16

5.27

-3.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.69

-0.42

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

9.59

-7.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.60

38.36

-31.77

MLPB vs. FTSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPB Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is lower than the FTSD Sharpe Ratio of 3.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPB and FTSD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLPBFTSDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

3.30

-1.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

1.33

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

1.15

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

1.04

-0.81

Drawdowns

MLPB vs. FTSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPB drawdown since its inception was -71.93%, which is greater than FTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPB and FTSD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPBFTSDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.93%

-5.32%

-66.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.68%

-0.45%

-9.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.49%

-0.93%

-15.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.41%

-5.04%

-15.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.93%

-5.32%

-66.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.69%

-0.12%

-4.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.83%

-0.60%

-14.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

0.11%

+3.02%

Volatility

MLPB vs. FTSD - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB) has a higher volatility of 5.40% compared to Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD) at 0.51%. This indicates that MLPB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPBFTSDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.40%

0.51%

+4.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.05%

1.03%

+9.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.51%

1.31%

+12.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.03%

1.85%

+18.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.11%

1.79%

+26.32%

MLPB vs. FTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FTSD's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPB vs. FTSD - Dividend Comparison

MLPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, more than FTSD's 4.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTSD
Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF
4.50%4.67%4.75%4.14%1.73%1.01%1.54%2.90%2.63%2.24%1.92%1.52%
MLPB
ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B
5.85%6.51%5.95%6.37%6.00%6.98%11.93%7.98%8.11%7.23%6.85%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLPB and FTSD have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MLPB has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to FTSD (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPB dropped -71.93% vs FTSD's -5.32%.

On 10-year performance, MLPB leads with 10.20% vs 2.05% for FTSD. On fees, FTSD is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FTSD has been the lower-risk option at 0.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MLPB has performed better with a 10.20% return vs 2.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTSD is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MLPB.

MLPB has the higher dividend yield at 5.85%, compared with 4.50% for FTSD.

MLPB is categorized as MLPs, while FTSD is Mortgage Backed Securities. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for MLPB and 0.25% for FTSD.

FTSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPB and FTSD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer