MLPA vs. TIP
MLPA (Global X MLP ETF) and TIP (iShares TIPS Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MLPA is a MLPs fund tracking the Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index, while TIP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MLPA returned 6.37%/yr vs 2.53%/yr for TIP. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MLPA charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for TIP.
Performance
MLPA vs. TIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPA achieves a 14.72% return, which is significantly higher than TIP's 1.40% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPA has outperformed TIP with an annualized return of 6.37%, while TIP has yielded a comparatively lower 2.53% annualized return.
MLPA
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -3.50%
- YTD
- 14.72%
- 6M
- 13.78%
- 1Y
- 13.99%
- 3Y*
- 16.87%
- 5Y*
- 13.94%
- 10Y*
- 6.37%
TIP
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 1.42%
- 1Y
- 4.76%
- 3Y*
- 4.00%
- 5Y*
- 0.91%
- 10Y*
- 2.53%
MLPA vs. TIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPA Global X MLP ETF | 14.72% | 5.73% | 20.35% | 15.93% | 27.03% | 39.64% | -33.97% | 11.91% | -15.71% | -8.31% |
TIP iShares TIPS Bond ETF | 1.40% | 6.77% | 1.65% | 3.80% | -12.26% | 5.68% | 10.84% | 8.35% | -1.42% | 2.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPA and TIP is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2012 | 0.01 |
The correlation between MLPA and TIP shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.08 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLPA vs. TIP — Risk / Return Rank
MLPA
TIP
MLPA vs. TIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) and iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MLPA | TIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.24 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 2.34 | -0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.85 | 7.00 | -2.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MLPA vs. TIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPA drawdown since its inception was -78.75%, which is greater than TIP's maximum drawdown of -14.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPA and TIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPA | TIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.75% | -14.57% | -64.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.33% | -1.98% | -6.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.20% | -4.54% | -9.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.75% | -14.51% | -4.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.05% | -14.51% | -59.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.96% | -0.46% | -4.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.24% | -3.43% | -16.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 0.66% | +2.14% |
Volatility
MLPA vs. TIP - Volatility Comparison
Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) has a higher volatility of 4.39% compared to iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) at 1.03%. This indicates that MLPA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLPA | TIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.39% | 1.03% | +3.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.56% | 2.32% | +6.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.93% | 3.39% | +8.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.19% | 6.21% | +11.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.45% | 5.74% | +21.71% |
MLPA vs. TIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPA has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than TIP's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
MLPA vs. TIP - Dividend Comparison
MLPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, more than TIP's 3.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPA Global X MLP ETF | 7.36% | 7.82% | 7.25% | 7.49% | 7.30% | 8.72% | 13.84% | 9.09% | 10.00% | 8.05% | 7.15% | 9.29% |
TIP iShares TIPS Bond ETF | 3.76% | 3.46% | 2.52% | 2.73% | 6.96% | 4.28% | 1.17% | 1.75% | 2.71% | 2.07% | 1.48% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MLPA and TIP have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MLPA has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to TIP (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPA dropped -78.75% vs TIP's -14.57%.
On 10-year performance, MLPA leads with 6.37% vs 2.53% for TIP. On fees, TIP is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, TIP has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MLPA has performed better with a 6.37% return vs 2.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TIP is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for MLPA.
MLPA has the higher dividend yield at 7.36%, compared with 3.76% for TIP.
MLPA is categorized as MLPs, while TIP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. MLPA tracks Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index, while TIP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for MLPA and 0.18% for TIP.
TIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MLPA and TIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer