MLPA vs. MLPIX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MLPA (Global X MLP ETF) and MLPIX (ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund) are both funds - MLPA is a MLPs fund tracking the Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index, while MLPIX is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund managed by ProFunds. Over the past 10 years, MLPA returned 6.04%/yr vs 9.09%/yr for MLPIX. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MLPA charges 0.77%/yr vs 1.78%/yr for MLPIX.

Performance

MLPA vs. MLPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) and ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund (MLPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPA achieves a 14.27% return, which is significantly higher than MLPIX's 10.16% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPA has underperformed MLPIX with an annualized return of 6.04%, while MLPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.09% annualized return.

MLPA

• 1D: 1.78%
• 1M: -4.45%
• YTD: 14.27%
• 6M: 14.04%
• 1Y: 15.23%
• 3Y*: 16.94%
• 5Y*: 14.82%
• 10Y*: 6.04%

MLPIX

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 3.11%
• YTD: 10.16%
• 6M: 8.52%
• 1Y: 19.25%
• 3Y*: 12.40%
• 5Y*: 6.84%
• 10Y*: 9.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPA vs. MLPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MLPA Global X MLP ETF	14.27%	5.73%	20.35%	15.93%	27.03%	39.64%	-33.97%	11.91%	-15.71%	-8.31%
MLPIX ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund	10.16%	5.48%	9.65%	13.32%	-8.61%	28.23%	1.85%	24.02%	-13.08%	10.45%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPA and MLPIX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2012	0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between MLPA and MLPIX has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

MLPA vs. MLPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPA

MLPA Risk / Return Rank: 36
MLPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
MLPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
MLPA Omega Ratio Rank: 33
MLPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
MLPA Martin Ratio Rank: 36

MLPIX

MLPIX Risk / Return Rank: 27
MLPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
MLPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
MLPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
MLPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
MLPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPA vs. MLPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) and ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund (MLPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MLPA	MLPIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.26	1.34	-0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.83	2.04	-0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.24	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.84	1.91	-0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.17	6.45	-1.28

MLPA vs. MLPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPA Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the MLPIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPA and MLPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MLPA vs. MLPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPA drawdown since its inception was -78.75%, which is greater than MLPIX's maximum drawdown of -60.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPA and MLPIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLPA	MLPIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.75%	-60.11%	-18.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.33%	-10.68%	+2.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.20%	-23.24%	+9.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.75%	-23.24%	+4.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-74.05%	-45.96%	-28.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.33%	-0.86%	-4.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.21%	-9.35%	-10.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.96%	3.16%	-0.20%

Volatility

MLPA vs. MLPIX - Volatility Comparison

Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) has a higher volatility of 4.66% compared to ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund (MLPIX) at 3.87%. This indicates that MLPA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLPA	MLPIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.66%	3.87%	+0.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.76%	10.64%	-1.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.14%	15.24%	-3.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.08%	19.44%	-1.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.44%	21.41%	+6.03%

MLPA vs. MLPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPA has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPIX's 1.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLPA vs. MLPIX - Dividend Comparison

MLPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.39%, more than MLPIX's 0.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MLPA Global X MLP ETF	7.39%	7.82%	7.25%	7.49%	7.30%	8.72%	13.84%	9.09%	10.00%	8.05%	7.15%	9.29%
MLPIX ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund	0.43%	0.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.89%	0.22%	0.40%	3.92%	10.95%	0.56%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLPA and MLPIX in my portfolio?

MLPA and MLPIX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MLPA or MLPIX?

MLPA has higher volatility (4.66%) compared to MLPIX (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPA dropped -78.75% vs MLPIX's -60.11%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MLPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.