MLPA vs. GLPIX

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

MLPA (Global X MLP ETF) and GLPIX (Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund) are both funds - MLPA is a MLPs fund tracking the Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index, while GLPIX is a Infrastructure Equities fund managed by Goldman Sachs. Over the past 10 years, MLPA returned 6.71%/yr vs 8.89%/yr for GLPIX. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MLPA charges 0.77%/yr vs 1.20%/yr for GLPIX.

Performance

MLPA vs. GLPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) and Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MLPA having a 21.83% return and GLPIX slightly lower at 21.79%. Over the past 10 years, MLPA has underperformed GLPIX with an annualized return of 6.71%, while GLPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.89% annualized return.

MLPA

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: 6.27%
• 6M: 14.54%
• YTD: 21.83%
• 1Y: 20.93%
• 3Y*: 16.99%
• 5Y*: 18.11%
• 10Y*: 6.71%
• ALL TIME*: 4.63%

GLPIX

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 3.75%
• 6M: 14.49%
• YTD: 21.79%
• 1Y: 22.73%
• 3Y*: 20.12%
• 5Y*: 20.87%
• 10Y*: 8.89%
• ALL TIME*: 5.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GLPIX Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
MLPA Global X MLP ETF	$8.12M	$8.66M	$10.73M

MLPA vs. GLPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MLPA Global X MLP ETF	21.83%	5.73%	20.35%	15.93%	27.03%	39.64%	-33.97%	11.91%	-15.71%	-8.31%
GLPIX Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund	21.79%	4.45%	28.00%	19.67%	26.06%	39.89%	-31.08%	7.04%	-14.57%	-5.13%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPA and GLPIX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	0.93

The correlation between MLPA and GLPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MLPA vs. GLPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MLPA

MLPA Risk / Return Rank: 64
MLPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
MLPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
MLPA Omega Ratio Rank: 61
MLPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
MLPA Martin Ratio Rank: 56

GLPIX

GLPIX Risk / Return Rank: 76
GLPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
GLPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
GLPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
GLPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
GLPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MLPA vs. GLPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) and Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MLPA	GLPIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	1.87	-0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	2.58	-0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.32	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.46	3.23	-0.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.61	8.39	-1.78

MLPA vs. GLPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPA Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the GLPIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPA and GLPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MLPA vs. GLPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPA drawdown since its inception was -78.75%, roughly equal to the maximum GLPIX drawdown of -75.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPA and GLPIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLPA	GLPIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.75%	-75.98%	-2.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.73%	-6.87%	-0.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.20%	-13.96%	-0.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.75%	-20.89%	+2.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-74.05%	-70.48%	-3.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.29%	+1.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.08%	-22.89%	+2.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.18%	2.64%	+0.54%

Volatility

MLPA vs. GLPIX - Volatility Comparison

Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) and Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX) have volatilities of 4.14% and 4.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLPA	GLPIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.14%	4.10%	+0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.72%	9.43%	+0.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.47%	11.87%	+0.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.73%	18.70%	-0.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.39%	25.81%	+1.58%

MLPA vs. GLPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPA has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than GLPIX's 1.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLPA vs. GLPIX - Dividend Comparison

MLPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.93%, more than GLPIX's 6.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLPIX Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund	6.15%	7.03%	6.60%	6.70%	6.00%	6.26%	9.72%	8.67%	8.02%	7.49%	11.46%	6.62%
MLPA Global X MLP ETF	6.93%	7.82%	7.25%	7.49%	7.30%	8.72%	13.84%	9.09%	10.00%	8.05%	7.15%	9.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLPA and GLPIX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, MLPA and GLPIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MLPA or GLPIX?

MLPA has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to GLPIX (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPA dropped -78.75% vs GLPIX's -75.98%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.