MLPA vs. BUXX
MLPA (Global X MLP ETF) and BUXX (Strive Enhanced Income Short Maturity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MLPA is a MLPs fund tracking the Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index, while BUXX is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Strive. MLPA is passively managed, while BUXX is actively managed. Over the past year, MLPA returned 19.63% vs 4.30% for BUXX. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. MLPA charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for BUXX.
Performance
MLPA vs. BUXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPA achieves a 17.49% return, which is significantly higher than BUXX's 1.61% return.
MLPA
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 17.49%
- 6M
- 14.69%
- 1Y
- 19.63%
- 3Y*
- 17.58%
- 5Y*
- 15.86%
- 10Y*
- 6.12%
BUXX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.61%
- 6M
- 1.98%
- 1Y
- 4.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MLPA vs. BUXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPA Global X MLP ETF | 17.49% | 5.73% | 20.35% | 5.13% |
BUXX Strive Enhanced Income Short Maturity ETF | 1.61% | 4.84% | 6.18% | 2.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPA and BUXX is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2023 | -0.03 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between MLPA and BUXX has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.03 to -0.25, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLPA vs. BUXX — Risk / Return Rank
MLPA
BUXX
MLPA vs. BUXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) and Strive Enhanced Income Short Maturity ETF (BUXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLPA | BUXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.85 | -0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 14.67 | -12.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.19 | 60.39 | -53.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLPA | BUXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 3.55 | -1.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 3.82 | -3.65 |
Drawdowns
MLPA vs. BUXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPA drawdown since its inception was -78.75%, which is greater than BUXX's maximum drawdown of -0.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPA and BUXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPA | BUXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.75% | -0.60% | -78.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.33% | -0.29% | -8.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.67% | 0.00% | -2.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.27% | -0.05% | -20.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 0.07% | +2.67% |
Volatility
MLPA vs. BUXX - Volatility Comparison
Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) has a higher volatility of 4.67% compared to Strive Enhanced Income Short Maturity ETF (BUXX) at 0.30%. This indicates that MLPA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLPA | BUXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.67% | 0.30% | +4.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.47% | 0.78% | +7.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.98% | 1.22% | +10.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.22% | 1.46% | +16.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.47% | 1.46% | +26.01% |
MLPA vs. BUXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPA has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than BUXX's 0.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
MLPA vs. BUXX - Dividend Comparison
MLPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.19%, more than BUXX's 4.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUXX Strive Enhanced Income Short Maturity ETF | 4.73% | 4.95% | 5.55% | 1.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MLPA Global X MLP ETF | 7.19% | 7.82% | 7.25% | 7.49% | 7.30% | 8.72% | 13.84% | 9.09% | 10.00% | 8.05% | 7.15% | 9.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MLPA and BUXX have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MLPA has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to BUXX (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPA dropped -78.75% vs BUXX's -0.60%.
On 1-year performance, MLPA leads with 19.63% vs 4.30% for BUXX. On fees, BUXX is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, BUXX has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MLPA has performed better with a 19.63% return vs 4.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BUXX is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for MLPA.
MLPA has the higher dividend yield at 7.19%, compared with 4.73% for BUXX.
MLPA is categorized as MLPs, while BUXX is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for MLPA and 0.26% for BUXX.
BUXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.55 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MLPA and BUXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer