PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MLN vs. REMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MLN vs. REMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MLN (VanEck Long Muni ETF) and REMX (VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MLN is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg AMT-Free Long Continuous, while REMX is a Materials fund tracking the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MLN returned 1.49%/yr vs 10.14%/yr for REMX. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. MLN charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for REMX.

Performance

MLN vs. REMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Long Muni ETF (MLN) and VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLN achieves a 1.92% return, which is significantly lower than REMX's 33.01% return. Over the past 10 years, MLN has underperformed REMX with an annualized return of 1.49%, while REMX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.14% annualized return.

MLN

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.46%
YTD
1.92%
6M
2.58%
1Y
9.33%
3Y*
3.46%
5Y*
-1.05%
10Y*
1.49%

REMX

1D
-3.78%
1M
-3.72%
YTD
33.01%
6M
37.14%
1Y
172.35%
3Y*
6.84%
5Y*
4.50%
10Y*
10.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLN vs. REMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLN
VanEck Long Muni ETF		1.92%1.82%1.54%8.05%-17.20%2.20%6.22%10.72%-0.77%8.19%
REMX
VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF		33.01%92.95%-35.02%-19.18%-31.13%79.81%64.82%0.74%-49.63%82.60%

Correlation

The correlation between MLN and REMX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2010

-0.02

The correlation between MLN and REMX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Long Muni ETF

VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF

Often compared with MLN:
MLN vs. SGOVMLN vs. HYMUMLN vs. LKORMLN vs. VCLTMLN vs. TLTMLN vs. EMNTMLN vs. BLV
Often compared with REMX:
REMX vs. LITREMX vs. XLBREMX vs. USARREMX vs. COPXREMX vs. RAREREMX vs. GNRREMX vs. WTRE

Return for Risk

MLN vs. REMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MLN
MLN Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
MLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
MLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLN Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
REMX
REMX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
REMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
REMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
REMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
REMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLN vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Long Muni ETF (MLN) and VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

MLNREMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.11

3.61

-1.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.15

3.66

-0.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.46

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

7.43

-3.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.02

21.32

-9.30

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MLN vs. REMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLN Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is lower than the REMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLN and REMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

MLNREMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

3.61

-1.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

0.11

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

0.28

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

-0.08

+0.40

Drawdowns

MLN vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLN drawdown since its inception was -28.36%, smaller than the maximum REMX drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLN and REMX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MLNREMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.36%

-90.20%

+61.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.56%

-23.35%

+20.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.84%

-62.11%

+52.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.46%

-73.34%

+48.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.46%

-73.34%

+48.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.58%

-54.98%

+48.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.73%

-66.87%

+61.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

8.12%

-7.34%

Volatility

MLN vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Long Muni ETF (MLN) is 1.56%, while VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) has a volatility of 13.02%. This indicates that MLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MLNREMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.56%

13.02%

-11.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.19%

34.77%

-31.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.45%

48.11%

-43.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.31%

40.24%

-32.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.88%

36.94%

-28.06%

MLN vs. REMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLN has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than REMX's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLN vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison

MLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, more than REMX's 1.32% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLN
VanEck Long Muni ETF		3.71%3.73%3.59%3.19%2.67%2.52%2.69%2.98%3.09%2.91%3.16%3.38%
REMX
VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF		1.32%1.76%2.56%0.00%1.56%5.25%0.81%1.64%12.43%2.89%2.23%4.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

MLN and REMX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REMX has higher volatility (13.02%) compared to MLN (1.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLN dropped -28.36% vs REMX's -90.20%.

On 10-year performance, REMX leads with 10.14% vs 1.49% for MLN. On fees, MLN is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, MLN has been the lower-risk option at 1.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, REMX has performed better with a 10.14% return vs 1.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MLN is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for REMX.

MLN has the higher dividend yield at 3.71%, compared with 1.32% for REMX.

MLN is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while REMX is Materials. MLN tracks Bloomberg AMT-Free Long Continuous, while REMX tracks MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for MLN and 0.59% for REMX.

REMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLN and REMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer