PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLMIX vs. TRRJX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLMIX vs. TRRJX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Core Portfolio (MLMIX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLMIX achieves a 5.75% return, which is significantly lower than TRRJX's 9.07% return.


MLMIX

1D
1.79%
1M
0.59%
YTD
5.75%
6M
4.15%
1Y
17.24%
3Y*
18.81%
5Y*
8.73%
10Y*

TRRJX

1D
0.31%
1M
1.23%
YTD
9.07%
6M
4.55%
1Y
15.44%
3Y*
14.06%
5Y*
6.48%
10Y*
9.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLMIX vs. TRRJX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLMIX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Core Portfolio
5.75%15.25%23.98%17.96%-19.37%17.56%21.23%30.97%-16.17%20.83%
TRRJX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund
9.07%10.96%11.99%18.14%-17.96%15.21%17.04%23.72%-6.95%20.07%

Correlation

The correlation between MLMIX and TRRJX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.92

The correlation between MLMIX and TRRJX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLMIX vs. TRRJX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLMIX
MLMIX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
MLMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MLMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

TRRJX
TRRJX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
TRRJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRRJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRRJX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
TRRJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRRJX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLMIX vs. TRRJX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Core Portfolio (MLMIX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLMIXTRRJXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.30

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

1.97

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.03

7.59

-2.57

MLMIX vs. TRRJX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the TRRJX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLMIX and TRRJX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLMIXTRRJXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

1.52

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.51

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.50

+0.07

Drawdowns

MLMIX vs. TRRJX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLMIX drawdown since its inception was -35.66%, smaller than the maximum TRRJX drawdown of -53.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLMIX and TRRJX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLMIXTRRJXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.66%

-53.57%

+17.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.31%

-8.06%

-5.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.56%

-12.52%

-7.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.79%

-25.85%

-2.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.23%

+0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.44%

-6.65%

-0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

2.06%

+1.36%

Volatility

MLMIX vs. TRRJX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Core Portfolio (MLMIX) has a higher volatility of 4.32% compared to T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX) at 2.93%. This indicates that MLMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRRJX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLMIXTRRJXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.32%

2.93%

+1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.41%

8.79%

+3.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.05%

10.46%

+4.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.49%

12.83%

+5.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.56%

13.54%

+6.02%

MLMIX vs. TRRJX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLMIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than TRRJX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLMIX vs. TRRJX - Dividend Comparison

Neither MLMIX nor TRRJX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLMIX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Core Portfolio
0.00%0.00%0.17%0.70%0.36%4.28%0.00%0.77%0.79%0.51%0.00%0.00%
TRRJX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund
0.00%0.00%2.36%4.68%9.67%6.89%4.80%5.68%8.55%3.80%2.89%4.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLMIX and TRRJX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MLMIX has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to TRRJX (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLMIX dropped -35.66% vs TRRJX's -53.57%.

TRRJX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLMIX and TRRJX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer