ALZN vs. GLD
ALZN (Alzamend Neuro, Inc.) is a stock, while GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Over the past 5 years, ALZN returned -83.34%/yr vs 16.82%/yr for GLD. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ALZN vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALZN achieves a -33.52% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's -6.10% return.
ALZN
- 1D
- 4.31%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- -48.95%
- YTD
- -33.52%
- 1Y
- -61.71%
- 3Y*
- -87.87%
- 5Y*
- -83.34%
- 10Y*
- —
GLD
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- -3.72%
- 6M
- -11.74%
- YTD
- -6.10%
- 1Y
- 20.82%
- 3Y*
- 27.06%
- 5Y*
- 16.82%
- 10Y*
- 11.36%
ALZN vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALZN Alzamend Neuro, Inc. | -33.52% | -82.57% | -86.97% | -89.50% | -70.27% | -93.45% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | -6.10% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 12.69% | -0.77% | -2.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALZN and GLD is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2021 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALZN vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
ALZN
GLD
ALZN vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alzamend Neuro, Inc. (ALZN) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ALZN | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.16 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | 0.80 | -1.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.28 | 1.93 | -3.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ALZN vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALZN drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALZN and GLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALZN | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -45.56% | -54.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.71% | -26.21% | -49.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.88% | -26.21% | -73.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.99% | -26.21% | -73.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -24.95% | -75.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -97.54% | -16.19% | -81.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 48.15% | 10.80% | +37.35% |
Volatility
ALZN vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
Alzamend Neuro, Inc. (ALZN) has a higher volatility of 20.32% compared to SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) at 6.99%. This indicates that ALZN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALZN | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.32% | 6.99% | +13.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 66.44% | 24.21% | +42.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.09% | 27.93% | +49.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 126.77% | 18.40% | +108.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 129.37% | 16.10% | +113.27% |
Dividends
ALZN vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
Neither ALZN nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ALZN and GLD have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ALZN has higher volatility (20.32%) compared to GLD (6.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALZN dropped -100.00% vs GLD's -45.56%.
GLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ALZN and GLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer